Apollo.io vs AiSDR
One of twelve models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; zero named AiSDR. Apollo.io was named by eleven of the twelve models and AiSDR by twelve and Apollo.io carries 23 labels and AiSDR 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty categories this edition.
By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of twelve modelsAiSDR
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Apollo.io AiSDR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and AiSDR on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, AiSDR not the choice
1 of 12 modelsAiSDR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io20%#1 of 11AiSDR2%#5 of 11AiSDR13%#2 of 11Apollo.io2%#10 of 11What the models said about Apollo.io
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about AiSDR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“AiSDR - Platform compliance issues, quality degradation at scale” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“AiSDR has significant control and flexibility limitations at a premium price point, with concerning hallucination rates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most teams should start with Tier 1 or 2 before jumping to Tier 3 autonomous agents.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“AiSDR | Only major vendor with quarterly contracts ($900/mo), transparent pricing, lower commitment risk” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Go with AiSDR for a hands-off, autonomous experience at mid-tier pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“🏆 Best Overall Value: AiSDR” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.