Apollo.io vs AiSDR
Three of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; two named AiSDR. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and AiSDR by fourteen and Apollo.io carries 33 labels and AiSDR 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-six categories this edition.
By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAiSDR
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Apollo.io AiSDR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and AiSDR on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, AiSDR an alternative
3 of 14 modelsAiSDR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.AiSDR first, Apollo.io an alternative
2 of 14 modelsApollo.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AiSDR6%#5 of 11Apollo.io0%#11 of 11What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Best for budget-conscious teams wanting database + outreach in one tab, giving high-end AI power to small teams who don't have a $5,000 monthly budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about AiSDR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“they appear more specialized and less universally established than Apollo or Qualified” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Not necessarily bad, but has specific limitations... it struggles with *cold outreach*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for lead nurturing, weaker for cold outreach” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“If you specifically need an autonomous AI SDR agent, AiSDR Solo at $250/mo is the current entry price point” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“AiSDR - Leads in many benchmarks for signals, personalization, reply handling, and reasoning.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with AiSDR or Artisan for pure AI SDR autonomy in mid-market B2B outbound.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.