Seven of fourteen models named Artisan Ava first on the direct prompt; two named AiSDR. Both were named by all fourteen models and Artisan Ava carries 53 labels and AiSDR 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Artisan Ava and AiSDR were named in the same answer seventy-eight times, of the 132 answers naming Artisan Ava and the 112 naming AiSDR. In those answers AiSDR took the first choice twenty-two times and Artisan Ava seventeen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Artisan faced platform-level enforcement including a LinkedIn ban ... Artisan reviews and third-party reports document concerns around zero quality leads despite high outreach volume” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“## Specific Platforms to Avoid Artisan (Ava) — Has significant output quality concerns, with a G2 rating of 3.8/5 (lowest among reviewed platforms)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Good for testing and experimentation, but avoid for production campaigns. The quality and governance issues are significant.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Artisan is the strongest fit in the results because it is described as an end-to-end outbound automation platform whose AI BDR handles prospecting, outreach, replies” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Highly regarded for end-to-end autonomy (sourcing, personalization, sending, reply handling) with good balance of automation and control.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd put Artisan's Ava on the shortlist first if you want a more complete outbound agent connected to your CRM” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“they appear more specialized and less universally established than Apollo or Qualified” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Not necessarily bad, but has specific limitations... it struggles with *cold outreach*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for lead nurturing, weaker for cold outreach” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“If you specifically need an autonomous AI SDR agent, AiSDR Solo at $250/mo is the current entry price point” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“AiSDR - Leads in many benchmarks for signals, personalization, reply handling, and reasoning.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with AiSDR or Artisan for pure AI SDR autonomy in mid-market B2B outbound.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.