Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 71 → 66 of 66
3 categories · Ranked11x
118Judge labels
9First choices
52Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in AI SDR for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 77 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of 11x →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business74 of 74
0%29 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market18 of 77
2%38 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 77
16%42 labels
criticized challenger
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named 11x for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 2% | 18 of 77 | 50% | 38 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI voice agents | Customer | 0% | 38 of 103 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Retell AI at 27% | |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 45 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, 11x held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI SDR · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 63 → 16 of 70
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 1 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 18 of 77 |
| AI voice agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 103, unchanged |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated 11x across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated 11x across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels5
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative33 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labels1
Negative30 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative118 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“At 500 people, Tier 3 (Agentic) is usually the target... Systems like 11x.ai, AiSDR, or Artisan that handle the full loop” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SDR · scale prompt · first choice
“If you want true autonomy Look at 11x or Artisan. These are the most "AI rep" style tools.” GPT-5.4 mini · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“11x.ai is the most autonomous AI SDR platform available today.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise/Full automation: 11x ($3,750+/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“11x had been listing companies as customers that were not customers, with ZoomInfo's lawyer threatening legal action” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Exercise extreme caution. The credibility issues and high failure rate in pilots make this a risky bet.” Kimi K2 · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“11x.ai: Worst performer in multiple reviews ... Specific agents to avoid or approach with extreme caution” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“This is often cited as the most prominent "cautionary tale." ... many teams have moved away due to poor ROI” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as 11x, over the 118 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 11x was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as 11x, over the 118 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 11x was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 11x. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 118 of the 118 answers that named 11x and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
artisan.co64
salesforge.ai63
11x.aiYour site53
amplemarket.com43
getvoip.com36
pipeline.zoominfo.com34
salesmotion.io31
aisdr.com30
unifygtm.com30
marketbetter.ai26
357 of the 410 domain citations in answers naming 11x came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
11x.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 11x takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
11x.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 11x takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai sdr agent”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai sdr agent”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“11x”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,108 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,146 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 760 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,855
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 44 clicks and $1,010 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 77 in AI SDR
Segment leader
24%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 118 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 118 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on 11x.ai
551
subdomains included
Content
378
counted in the table below
Documentation
80
Product · Integration
42 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 258 | 100 | 2026-09-19 | Landing pages, AI SDR | |
| Blog | 71 | 3 | 2026-07-24 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 19 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 9 | 9 | 2026-07-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 3 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-19Ai sales engagement tools b2b sales teams report or ebook
- 2026-09-19Ai sales prospecting tools b2b sales teams report or ebook
- 2026-09-19Ai sales sequencing tools b2b sales teams report or ebook
- 2026-09-19Nooks pricing report or ebook
- 2026-09-19Polyai pricing report or ebook
- 2026-09-19Regal ai pricing report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page 11x.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as 11x
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 11x; a claim can dispute any of them.
11x.ai 1111x.ai (Alice) 611x (Alice) 511x.ai (Alice & Julian) 411x (AI agent "Alice") 111x (Alice & Julian AI Agents) 111x.ai (Alice for outbound, Julian for inbound) 1
Follow 11x
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
11x is its own company.ShowHide
The company
11x is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Digital workers, Human results
- For
- Sales, RevOps, and GTM Leaders
- Integrations claimed
- 4 11x.ai
- Certifications
- SOC-2 complianceCASA Tier 3SOC 2 Type 2
- Hosting
- GlobalSan FranciscoLondon
- Customers named
- CheckrcanibuildMMB NetworksLeica BiosystemscofensterWorkeraUnitechQuestex
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial
What 11x's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: 11x.ai, trust.11x.ai, 11x.ai/solutions/sales, 11x.ai/customers, 11x.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 11x's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 11x, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 11x by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where 11x is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name 11x, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.