AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › ZoomInfo Copilot · October 2026 Edition
ZoomInfo · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

ZoomInfo Copilot

19Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZoomInfo Copilot was named 6 times in AI SDR and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZoomInfo Copilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI SDR agentsSales0%22 of 770%5under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%85 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, ZoomInfo Copilot held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI SDR · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 → 54 of 66
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 → 20 of 70
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 of 69, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI SDR0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 59 → 22 of 77
CRM data quality0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 85 of 99, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ZoomInfo Copilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels2
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ZoomInfo Copilot if your primary bottleneck is identifying *which* accounts are actively looking to buy.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative
“offers intent-driven prioritization and data accuracy, suited for mid-market to enterprise” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If data accuracy and intent signals are a priority, ZoomInfo Copilot is a better fit.” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Teams needing verified B2B data and AI-driven account intelligence” Kimi K2 · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo Copilot, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo Copilot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io11 of 194Not among the top eight
Artisan Ava9 of 192Not among the top eight
AiSDR8 of 193Not among the top eight
11x5 of 193Not among the top eight
Clay5 of 190Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce SDR4 of 191Not among the top eight
Regie.ai4 of 190Not among the top eight
Reply.io Jason4 of 190Not among the top eight
Salesforge Agent Frank3 of 191Not among the top eight
Outreach3 of 190Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZoomInfo Copilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named ZoomInfo Copilot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.comYour site15
salesforge.ai13
artisan.co8
11x.ai6
blog.hubspot.com6
landbase.com5
marketsandmarkets.com5
monday.com5
amplemarket.com4
coldreach.ai3

Fifty-five of the seventy domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo Copilot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ZoomInfo Copilot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZoomInfo Copilot; a claim can dispute any of them.
ZoomInfo 1ZoomInfo Copilot / GTM Workspace 1

Follow ZoomInfo Copilot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo Copilot.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Vancouver, Washington, United States
Founded
2000
Ownership
Public, GTM on Nasdaq

Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
an AI sales agent
Free plan or trial
Free Trial zoominfo.com/copilot
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPAZoomInfo Copilot Administrator CertificationZoomInfo Copilot Certification
Customers named
SeismicSpekitMcGriffMicrosoftmonday.comCapital OneMongoDBAnthropic
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What ZoomInfo Copilot's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zoominfo.com/copilot, engineering.zoominfo.com/experience-with-github-copilot-for-developer-productivity-at-zoominfo, university.zoominfo.com/page/zoominfo-copilot, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/announcing-zoominfo-copilot, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/introducing-zoominfo-copilot. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo Copilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo Copilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZoomInfo Copilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ZoomInfo Copilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZoomInfo Copilot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoominfo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.