Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
ZoomInfo · 1 category · Named, not rankedZoomInfo + Intent Add-on
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on was named 2 times in Intent data, where Apollo.io led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 60
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 23 of 60 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 of 58, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 60, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Budget-constrained / sales-led option: ZoomInfo intent add-on” Muse Glimmer 30B · Intent data · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Already using ZoomInfo for contacts | ZoomInfo Intent” Kimi K2 · Intent data · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
artisan.co2
demandbase.com2
martal.ca2
zenabm.com2
autobound.ai1
b2bsaasreviews.com1
buska.io1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
cognism.com1
dataintelo.com1
Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on; a claim can dispute any of them.
ZoomInfo + Intent add-on 1ZoomInfo intent add-on 1
Follow ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on.ShowHide
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- zoominfo.com
- Headquarters
- Vancouver, Washington, United States
- Founded
- 2000
- Ownership
- Public, GTM on Nasdaq
- Also from ZoomInfo
- Chorus by ZoomInfo, ZoomInfo Chat, ZoomInfo Copilot, ZoomInfo Copilot Dialer, ZoomInfo Engage, ZoomInfo GTM Studio, ZoomInfo GTM Workspace, ZoomInfo Marketing and 11 more
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Surface Buyer Signals in Your AI Tools
- For
- GTM teams
- Price stated
- MCP is included with every ZoomInfo subscription at no additional cost, Search Intent is free, and Enrich Company Signals costs 1 credit per signal. pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/mcp-intent-data
- Free plan or trial
- Search Intent is free. pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/mcp-intent-data
- Integrations claimed
- 6 pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/intent-data-platform
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPAISO 27001ISO 27701TRUSTe GDPRTRUSTe CCPA
- Customers named
- Microsoftmonday.comCapital OneMongoDBSeismicSafety Services
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: engineering.zoominfo.com/tag/add-on, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/mcp-intent-data, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/use-zoominfo-intent, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/intent-data-platform, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/intent-data-relaunch. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.