Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 23 → 9 of 63
2 categories · RankedTrustRadius
58Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Intent data for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TrustRadius →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 68
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 60
0%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 46
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TrustRadius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 14 of 60 | 14% | 21 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 92 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TrustRadius held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 58
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 14 of 60 |
| Reviews | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 37 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TrustRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TrustRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative16 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Manufacturing & Hardware (Vendor Portals) ... Managing a presence here is essential for hardware vendors” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative
“first-party/second-party signals (e.g., G2, TrustRadius, or your own website visitor identifiers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Intent data · negative prompt · alternative
“consider first-party intent data (your own website analytics + G2/TrustRadius review signals)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Intent data · negative prompt · alternative
“Great for downstream educated purchase decisions in mid-market and enterprise” MiniMax M2.5 · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2/TrustRadius/TechTarget-style intent can be useful, but it is often best for product-category research” GPT-5.4 mini · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
“G2/TrustRadius | Review-site precision | Narrow (SaaS only), add-on pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
“TrustRadius has lower volume in niche verticals” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TrustRadius, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TrustRadius was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TrustRadius, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TrustRadius was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TrustRadius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 58 answers that named TrustRadius and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
demandbase.com34
salesmotion.io22
percepture.com19
hginsights.com15
rb2b.com15
pipeline.zoominfo.com14
zenabm.com13
cognism.com12
g2.com12
forrester.com10
166 of the 166 domain citations in answers naming TrustRadius came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trustradius.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TrustRadius takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trustradius.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TrustRadius takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“trustradius”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 217,045 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 78,291 · 670 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 16,407
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 55 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on trustradius.com
52,437
subdomains included
Content
50,141
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 18
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 49,745 | undated | CRM, DAM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 213 | undated | CRM, Scheduling | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 49 | 0 | 2021-04-19 | Tag management, Automation & iPaaS | |
| Conference or event | 40 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 40 | undated | |||
| Blog | 37 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | SEO | |
| Podcast or video | 10 | 0 | 2025-08-28 | ||
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2021-09-14 | SEO | |
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-10-222026 buyers choice media kit blog
- 2025-08-28Reviews after dark podcast or video
- 2025-06-05How bonterra improved brand reputation and trscore through ethical review sourcing blog
- 2025-04-07Media Kit - Bridging the Trust Gap: B2B Tech Buying in the Age of AI blog
- 2025-03-24Customer spotlight financial services platform blog
- 2025-02-27Customer spotlight fortune 500 company blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trustradius.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (1092); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TrustRadius
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TrustRadius; a claim can dispute any of them.
G2 / TrustRadius 1TrustRadius For Vendors 1
Follow TrustRadius
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TrustRadius is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TrustRadius is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a review platform for verified B2B technology and software reviews through a proprietary algorithm and human verification
- For
- technology buyers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What TrustRadius's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trustradius.com, trustradius.com/products/trust/pricing, trustradius.com/products/mo. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TrustRadius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TrustRadius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TrustRadius by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TrustRadius is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TrustRadius, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.