TrustRadius

Named in 12 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

0% in Intent data

Rank 11 of 40 products named in b2b intent data providers, accepted challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TrustRadius. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B intent data providers	Sales	0%	11 of 40	0%	12	accepted challenger

By model

How each model treated TrustRadius across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	3	4
Claude Opus 4.8	0	1	1
GPT-6 Astra	1	1	2
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	2	2
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	0	1

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“under 20% audience overlap with G2, so the two are complementary rather than redundant” Claude Opus 5 · Intent data · comparative prompt · alternative

“Similar to G2, but centered on peer review and evaluation intent” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Intent data · comparative prompt · alternative

“G2 or TrustRadius for software evaluation signals” GPT-6 Astra · Intent data · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as TrustRadius

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TrustRadius; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TrustRadius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.