Klenty

Named in 5 judge labels across 1 category by 3 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 1 first choice, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

4% in Sales engagement

Rank 4 of 32 products named in sales engagement platforms. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Klenty. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales engagement platforms	Sales	4%	4 of 32	0%	5	under 10 labels

By model

How each model treated Klenty across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	0	3	3
Claude Opus 4.8	1	0	1
GPT-6 Astra	0	0	0
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	0	0
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	1	1

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Klenty is often the best balance of features and price.” Claude Opus 4.8 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · first choice

“Klenty in particular is positioned as best value for mid-market outbound at $50–99/user/mo” Claude Opus 5 · Sales engagement · direct prompt · alternative

“Klenty offers the closest feature parity to Outreach/Salesloft at 40–60% lower cost.” Claude Opus 5 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative

“if you want a budget-conscious mid-market tool with multi-channel capabilities” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Sales engagement · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as Klenty

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Klenty; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Klenty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.