Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 7 of 48
1 category · RankedMixmax
41Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales engagement for small business buyers
Rank 14 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 49
2%27 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market14 of 66
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise41 of 45
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mixmax for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 14 of 66 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mixmax held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales engagement · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 13 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 47 → 42 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 14 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mixmax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mixmax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Another affordable option, Mixmax is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness, especially for small teams.” Mistral Small · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“For Gmail-centric teams: Mixmax offers the best user experience at a reasonable price” Kimi K2 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“Need lighter, email-first automation? Pick Mixmax or Yesware” Perplexity Sonar · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
“Live in Gmail and want fast adoption? → Mixmax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mixmax, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mixmax was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mixmax, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mixmax was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mixmax. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 41 answers that named Mixmax and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com25
artisan.co21
cloudtalk.io19
avoma.com15
klenty.com14
mixmax.comYour site13
pipeline.zoominfo.com13
learn.g2.com11
resources.rework.com11
skylead.io11
140 of the 153 domain citations in answers naming Mixmax came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mixmax.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mixmax takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mixmax.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mixmax takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“mixmax”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 81 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,518 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,356 · 85 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,801
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mixmax.com
927
subdomains included
Content
574
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
13 · 18
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 450 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Comparison | 57 | 0 | 2026-05-12 | ||
| Case study | 30 | 0 | 2024-08-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 26 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2019-06-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2023-02-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2015-02-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-28Build and send outreach with the mixmax mcp blog
- 2026-05-25Meeting request email templates blog
- 2026-05-25Pricing inquiry response templates blog
- 2026-05-25Re engagement email templates stale leads blog
- 2026-05-24Mixmax platform overview may2026 blog
- 2026-05-22Follow up after sales demo blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mixmax.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Mixmax
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mixmax is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mixmax is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the AI sales execution platform that helps revenue teams close more deals with less busywork
- For
- revenue teams
- Price stated
- Mixmax Free; Inbox Copilot $29/user/month; Meeting Copilot $29; Engagement Copilot $49; Mixmax Suite $89 mixmax.com
- Starting price
- 0 mixmax.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free to start — no credit card mixmax.com
- Certifications
- Audited by GoogleGDPRSOC 2SOC 2 Type IIHIPAACPRASOC 3Google Audited
- Customers named
- BraintrustAmplitudeVerasetMeltwaterGatewiseOutbound SquadBennieHostfully
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Mixmax's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mixmax.com, mixmax.com/pricing, mixmax.com/security, mixmax.com/product, mixmax.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mixmax's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mixmax, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mixmax by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mixmax is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mixmax, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.