Every category where a model named Mailshake for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Value selling tools	Sales	0%	24 of 116	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%
Sales engagement platforms	Sales	0%	19 of 66	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mailshake yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mailshake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Email Outreach: Mailshake Free (50 contacts) or Apollo Free (60 credits)” Kimi K2 · Value selling · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Cold Email ... Cold email outreach with AI writing assistant” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative

“For Budget-Conscious Teams: Mailshake: More affordable pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales engagement · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Email/Prospecting: Mailshake Free / Hunter.io Free + Apollo Free” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mailshake, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailshake was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io29 of 3714Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales Hub23 of 379Not among the top eight

Lemlist21 of 371Not among the top eight

Outreach20 of 372Not among the top eight

Salesloft19 of 372Not among the top eight

Klenty15 of 371Not among the top eight

Reply.io14 of 370Not among the top eight

Instantly12 of 372Not among the top eight

Mixmax10 of 371Not among the top eight

Smartlead7 of 371Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mailshake. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 37 answers that named Mailshake and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com25

klenty.com17

g2.com14

cloudtalk.io13

pipeline.zoominfo.com13

lagrowthmachine.com12

resources.rework.com11

unifygtm.com11

avoma.com8

sparkle.io8

132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Mailshake came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

klenty.com/blog/sales-engagement-platform-tools16

blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-engagement15

cloudtalk.io/blog/sales-engagement-platform11

blog.hubspot.com/sales/small-business-sales-tools8

us.fitgap.com/search/value-selling-tools/small-business8

artisan.co/blog/the-best-sales-engagement-platforms7

avoma.com/blog/best-sales-engagement-platforms7

lagrowthmachine.com/sales-tools-small-businesses-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mailshake.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mailshake takes 0% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “value selling tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best value selling tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“mailshake”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 18,061 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,420 · 180 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 5,384
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as PRIYANKA SHARMA, verified. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 116 in value selling

Segment leader

21%

Minoa

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 37 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mailshake.com

835

subdomains included

Content

491

counted in the table below

Documentation

207

Product · Integration

11 · 32

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	450	0	2026-06-26	Dialers, ABM
Comparison	12	0	2026-03-22
Glossary or explainer	11	0	2026-06-25
Case study	7	0	2026-03-30
Podcast or video	4	0	2026-03-10
Conference or event	2	0	2026-01-19
Report or ebook	2	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2026-01-10
Template or tool	1	0	2026-02-02
News or press	1	0	2023-07-26

Most recent

2026-06-26Sales pitch mastery the essential 2026 guide blog
2026-06-25What is a drip campaign the essential guide glossary or explainer
2026-06-20The essential objection handling guide for sales blog
2026-06-19Buyer persona examples the essential visual guide blog
2026-06-18Best ai outreach tools in 2026 blog
2026-06-18The essential guide to account based marketing blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mailshake.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Mailshake

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mailshake; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mailshake Free 4

Follow Mailshake

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mailshake is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: A simple solution for email outreach.
mailshake.com
For: sales teams
mailshake.com
Price stated: Starter $29 /MO; Email Outreach $49 /MO; Sales Engagement $99 /MO; Data Finder $19 /MO; Ready to Use Mailboxes $12 /MO mailshake.com/pricing
Starting price: 29 mailshake.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: No, we collect payment up front mailshake.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 1000 mailshake.com/pricing
Customers named: SaaSMQLVirtuanceBrandStarNew Reach MarketingEnablixLeadBungeeScrollThink Bullish
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting

What Mailshake's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mailshake.com, mailshake.com/pricing, mailshake.com/security, mailshake.com/use-cases, mailshake.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mailshake's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mailshake, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mailshake by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Mailshake is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mailshake, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.