Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 9 of 48
1 category · RankedYesware
24Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales engagement for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 49
2%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 66
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 45
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Yesware for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 2% | 6 of 66 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Yesware held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales engagement · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 6 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 44 → 24 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 6 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Yesware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Yesware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For tightest budgets: Start with Yesware (free) or Zoho SalesIQ ($7/user)” Kimi K2 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · first choice
“Yesware offers paid plans from $15/user/month and is best for individual sales reps and small teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“Yesware Pro at $19/user/month is the most affordable paid option for email-first teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“The most affordable entry point for lightweight email tracking and templates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Yesware, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yesware was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Yesware, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yesware was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Yesware. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 24 answers that named Yesware and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com15
cloudtalk.io15
salesforge.ai9
unifygtm.com8
artisan.co7
smartlead.ai7
g2.com6
connectsafely.ai5
klenty.com5
learn.g2.com5
Eighty-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Yesware came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
yesware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Yesware takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
yesware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Yesware takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“yesware”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 37 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 79,195 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,377 · 257 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,113
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on yesware.com
1,103
subdomains included
Content
858
counted in the table below
Documentation
68
Product · Integration
28 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 782 | undated | CRM, Enrichment | ||
| Podcast or video | 32 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 18 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 12 | undated | |||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page yesware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Yesware
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Yesware; a claim can dispute any of them.
Yesware Pro 1
Follow Yesware
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Yesware.ShowHide
The company
Yesware.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- yesware.com
- Founded
- 2010
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales engagement platform that helps sales teams do meaningful email outreach at scale.
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- 14 day trial, then free forever. No credit card required. yesware.com
- Starting price
- 0 yesware.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14 day trial. No credit card required. yesware.com
- Integrations claimed
- 8 yesware.com/plans-and-pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II Complianceinternationally recognized compliance certification
- Customers named
- EvertrueTaylor & Hart6,000+ teamsMimeoFundboxPlacesterGuidebookAcquia
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Yesware's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: yesware.com, yesware.com/plans-and-pricing, trust.yesware.com, yesware.com/platform/gmail, yesware.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Yesware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Yesware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Yesware by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Yesware is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Yesware, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.