Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 123
3 categories · RankedSalesHood
95Judge labels
16First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Sales coaching for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SalesHood →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business6 of 128
5%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 124
20%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 83
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
In sales coaching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SalesHood for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 20% | 2 of 124 | 4% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 2% | 8 of 72 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 61 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SalesHood held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales coaching · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 27% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 → 2 of 118
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 8 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 27% | 17% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 124 |
| Sales enablement | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 of 72, unchanged |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SalesHood across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SalesHood across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels9
Paraphrase11 labels5
Comparative34 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mid-market teams often land on SalesHood or Showpad Coach for a balanced blend of price, deployment speed and coaching features” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales coaching · direct prompt · first choice
“SalesHood — Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with SalesHood if you want a purpose-built mid-market solution” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend SalesHood as the best sales onboarding and enablement training tool for a mid-sized B2B company.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend SalesHood if your main goal is sales onboarding + enablement training” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“but it's pricier at $45/user/month” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales coaching · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SalesHood, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesHood was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SalesHood, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesHood was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SalesHood. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 95 answers that named SalesHood and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindtickle.com46
g2.com44
learn.g2.com42
dock.us35
pitchmonster.io31
pipeline.zoominfo.com26
prospeo.io25
spekit.com24
blog.hubspot.com23
itsconvo.com21
317 of the 317 domain citations in answers naming SalesHood came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
saleshood.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SalesHood takes 20% of first choices and MindTickle takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
saleshood.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SalesHood takes 20% of first choices and MindTickle takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales coaching and training platform”
3
Position for “best sales coaching and training platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“saleshood”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,628 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 686 · 52 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,516
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
20%
rank 2 of 124 in sales coaching
Segment leader
24%
MindTickle
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 95 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 94 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on saleshood.com
492
subdomains included
Content
357
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
2 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 219 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 75 | 5 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 21 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Case study | 16 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2024-01-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ai powered sko 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-27Watch replay webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-15New economics revenue enablement blog
- 2026-09-04Watch replay webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-01Sf bay area wine tasting res conference or event
- 2026-08-27Veritiv cmo ai gtm playbook webinar or virtual event
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 23, 2026Sales Enablement Summit San Francisco 2026San Francisco · spoke
- September 22, 2026Sales Enablement Summit San Francisco 2026San Francisco · spoke
As the event pages on saleshood.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page saleshood.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SalesHood
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SalesHood is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SalesHood is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Powered Revenue Enablement
- For
- GTM teams
- Customers named
- StarComplianceCopadoFederatoSmartRecruitersKPADISQOOmada HealthEwing Foley
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SalesHood's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: saleshood.com, saleshood.com/pricing, trust.saleshood.com, saleshood.com/platform-tour, saleshood.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesHood's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesHood, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SalesHood by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SalesHood is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SalesHood, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where SalesHood is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where SalesHood is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSalesHood is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales coaching and training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.