Every category where a model named Seismic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales enablement and content	Sales	8%	6 of 81	59%	51	criticized challenger
Digital sales rooms	Sales	2%	8 of 59	36%	25	criticized challenger
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	121 of 124	38%	16	criticized challenger
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	63 of 75	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	92 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	72 of 79	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	44 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aloware at 18%
Sales engagement platforms	Sales	0%	27 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Salesloft at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Seismic yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Seismic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	3	2	6
GPT-5.4 mini	2	4	1	2	9
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	2	10	15
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	3	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	2	3	8
Mistral Small	2	0	2	2	6
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	4	6	12
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	3	3	6	14
Kimi K2	1	1	2	6	10
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	2	2	5
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	4	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct53 labels14

Paraphrase60 labels22

Comparative85 labels17not counted in share

Budget-constrained48 labels10

Scale-constrained38 labels7

Negative72 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative356 labels in all, every segment counted; 53 of the 73 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd usually recommend Seismic if your main goal is to give sales reps a strong, scalable content management and enablement system.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Seismic is arguably the leader... Go with Seismic if you are building a modern sales infrastructure and need deep analytics.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · direct prompt · first choice

“### 1. Seismic (formerly Highspot) - Primary Strength: Enterprise content management + guided selling” Mistral Small · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice

“Seismic is the market heavyweight. Its strongest differentiator is advanced content governance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid purchasing a massive "do-it-all" enterprise system (like Seismic) unless you have at least one dedicated, full-time Sales Enablement Administrator.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · direct prompt · hard negative

“What I'd Avoid for Mid-Market ... Expensive ($75K+ minimums), heavy implementation, built for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms (Seismic, Highspot, Gong, Mindtickle) — most require $20K–$50K+ annual minimums” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales enablement · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid ... Seismic and Highspot are generally over-engineered and overpriced for mid-market teams” Kimi K2 · Sales enablement · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Seismic, over the 356 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Seismic was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Highspot290 of 35611Not in the top three

MindTickle225 of 35640Not in the top three

Showpad175 of 3566Not in the top three

Allego148 of 3567Not in the top three

Dock116 of 35622Not in the top three

Gong108 of 35614Not in the top three

Trumpet78 of 35619Not in the top three

Spekit75 of 3567Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub73 of 35634Not in the top three

SalesHood71 of 3568Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Seismic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 356 answers that named Seismic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mindtickle.com32

learn.g2.com29

showpad.com29

dock.us26

g2.com20

spekit.com17

highspot.com15

federicopresicci.com14

alignedup.com13

gartner.com13

208 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming Seismic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dock.us/library/sales-enablement-software15

showpad.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-a-ranked-comparison-202615

dock.us/library/digital-sales-room-software13

mindtickle.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-comparison-and-review13

mindtickle.com/blog/best-sales-enablement-platforms13

getaccept.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software11

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-software11

learn.g2.com/best-sales-enablement-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Seismic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Seismic; a claim can dispute any of them.

Seismic (formerly InsideSales.com) 1Seismic / Highspot (Merged) 1Seismic / Lessonly 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Seismic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Seismic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at seismic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.