Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 56 → 8 of 69
6 categories · RankedSpekit
94Judge labels
8First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales coaching for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 73 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Spekit →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market8 of 73
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise36 of 47
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In sales rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Spekit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 2% | 8 of 73 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 2% | 12 of 124 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital adoption and onboarding | Customer | 2% | 12 of 45 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 30% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 15 of 72 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 80 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Knowledge base and self-service | Customer | 0% | 53 of 88 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Notion at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Spekit held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales rooms · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 of 45, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales rooms | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 56 → 8 of 73 |
| Digital adoption | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 12 of 45 |
| Sales enablement | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 15 of 72 |
| Sales coaching | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 12 of 124 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 94, unchanged |
| Knowledge base | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 88, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Spekit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Spekit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels1
Paraphrase18 labels2
Comparative25 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained11 labels4
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Trumpet or Spekit appear to be the leading choices currently.” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · direct prompt · first choice
“Spekit is phenomenal for sales/CRM enablement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Digital adoption · scale prompt · first choice
“Spekit is the strongest choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider smaller/independent platforms (Mindtickle, Allego, Spekit, SalesHood) that may offer more stability” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales enablement · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spekit, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spekit was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spekit, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spekit was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spekit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 94 answers that named Spekit and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spekit.comYour site49
learn.g2.com45
g2.com44
dock.us32
mindtickle.com28
guideflow.com25
blog.hubspot.com21
cirrusinsight.com19
pitchmonster.io19
itsconvo.com17
250 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming Spekit came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spekit.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Spekit takes 2% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spekit.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Spekit takes 2% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital sales room platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital sales room platform”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“spekit”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,062 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,648 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,698
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $86 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 73 in sales rooms
Segment leader
29%
Dock
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 94 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 94 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spekit.com
732
subdomains included
Content
462
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
40 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 233 | 14 | 2026-09-25 | CPQ, Sales enablement | |
| Template or tool | 67 | 0 | 2025-06-12 | CPQ | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 60 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 32 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 21 | 3 | 2026-09-25 | Digital adoption | |
| Podcast or video | 18 | 0 | 2025-12-09 | ||
| Case study | 17 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 11 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-02-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Digital adoption platform vs revenue enablement platform comparison
- 2026-09-25Migrate from highspot to spekit blog
- 2026-09-25Migrate from seismic to spekit blog
- 2026-09-25Sales enablement platforms mcp servers blog
- 2026-09-24Best platforms for real time sales guidance inside salesforce blog
- 2026-09-24Build sales enablement with chatgpt or claude vs buy comparison
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 22, 2026 to September 23, 2026Sales Enablement Summit San Francisco 2026Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, Burlingame · exhibited
- September 15, 2026 to September 17, 2026Dreamforce 2026Moscone Center, San Francisco · exhibited
- March 12, 2026 to March 13, 2026Sales Enablement Summit New York 2026Convene, New York · exhibited
As the event pages on spekit.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spekit.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Spekit
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spekit; a claim can dispute any of them.
Spekit/Dock 1
Follow Spekit
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Spekit is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Spekit is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered revenue enablement platform that delivers coaching, content, and deal intelligence inside rep workflows for B2B revenue teams.
- For
- high-growth B2B revenue teams with high change velocity
- Certifications
- SOC 2 compliantGartner recognizedG2 #1 Ease of Use
- Customers named
- MedallionCardinal GroupWarmlyFlorenceQ4PacvueEmployment HeroScholastic
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Spekit's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: spekit.com, trust.spekit.com, spekit.com/platform, spekit.com/case-studies, spekit.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spekit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spekit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spekit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Spekit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spekit, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.