RFP response software
Asked as “RFP response software”, and as “proposal management software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · PandaDoc 16%
25Loopio16PandaDoc14Responsive46others
25% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Loopio vs ProposifyLoopio vs AutoRFP.aiLoopio vs 1upLoopio vs QwilrPandaDoc vs ResponsivePandaDoc vs DeepRFPPandaDoc vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs AutoRFP.aiPandaDoc vs 1upPandaDoc vs QwilrResponsive vs DeepRFPResponsive vs ProposifyResponsive vs AutoRFP.aiResponsive vs 1upResponsive vs QwilrDeepRFP vs ProposifyDeepRFP vs AutoRFP.aiDeepRFP vs 1upDeepRFP vs QwilrProposify vs AutoRFP.aiProposify vs 1upProposify vs QwilrAutoRFP.ai vs 1upAutoRFP.ai vs Qwilr1up vs Qwilr
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Loopio25%
Loopio25%02PandaDoc16%
PandaDoc16%03Responsive14%
Responsive14%04DeepRFP7%
DeepRFP7%05Proposify5%
Proposify5%06AutoRFP.ai2%
AutoRFP.ai2%071up2%
1up2%08Qwilr2%
Qwilr2%09Upland Qvidian0%
Upland Qvidian0%10Inventive AI0%
Inventive AI0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proposify28%
9 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“General proposal tools like Proposify and PandaDoc: These excel at sales proposals but fall short for true RFPs.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
PandaDoc31%
11 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“General proposal tools like Proposify and PandaDoc: These excel at sales proposals but fall short for true RFPs.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Loopio16%
9 of 56 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“**Loopio** specifically called out as "not AI-native"—built in 2014 with AI added around 2021” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Responsive20%
9 of 46 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Be Cautious With: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) ... This is the most criticized major platform based on consistent negative feedback” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1003 links across 166 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Responsive38 answers · 69 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow37 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Inventive36 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Loopio31 answers · 43 citations · 14 models
30 answers · 63 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SiftHub28 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Storyflow21 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AutoRFP.ai20 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · BidSparq20 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GetApp17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · DeepRFP16 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 12 models
22 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best rfp response software”, “rfp response software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loopio loopio.com | 25% | 220 | 3,600 | 80 | 4,640 | 26 | ||
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 16% | 527 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | |
| Responsive responsive.io | 14% | 213 | 12,100 | 210,141 | 37,620 | 16 | 5 | |
| PowerRFP powerrfp.com | 9% | 19 | 10 | 0 | 79 | 2 | ||
| DeepRFP deeprfp.com | 7% | 38 | 170 | 0 | 677 | |||
| BreezeDocs breezedocs.ai Breeze Docs 5%, BreezeDocs 2% | 7% | 12 | ||||||
| Proposify proposify.com | 5% | 274 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | ||
| Tribble tribble.ai | 4% | 21 | 8 | |||||
| Expedience Proposal Software | 4% | |||||||
| AutoRFP.ai autorfp.ai | 2% | 76 | 70 | 0 | 38,771 | 2 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 13 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (autorfp.ai, inventive.ai, responsive.io, sifthub.io). The first result for “best rfp response software” is kantiv.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best RFP response software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which proposal management software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top RFP response tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best RFP response software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a RFP response software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which RFP response tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5TribblePandaDocChangedLoopioagainst: Upland QvidianDeepRFP, iQuoteXpressno first choiceagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, SteerlabThree alternatives
DealHub, Proposable, ProposifyFour alternatives
Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, GovDash, ResponsiveOne alternative
SmartDocsGPT-5.4 miniLoopioProposifyChangedResponsiveagainst: Upland QvidianRFP Response Builderagainst: Loopio, Responsiveno first choicenothing named
One alternative
ResponsiveOne alternative
QwilrTwo alternatives
Loopio, PandaDocTwo alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, RequestFXGemini 3.5 FlashTribbleagainst: ResponsiveResponsiveChangedLoopio, ResponsiveRFP.aiagainst: Loopio, ResponsiveLoopio, Responsiveagainst: Coupa, Loopio, Responsive, SAP Ariba, Upland Qvidian, Workday Sourcing
Three alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, SteerlabFive alternatives
GetAccept, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrSeven alternatives
1up.ai, Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, Civio AI, GovDash, Perceptis AI, Procurement SciencesFive alternatives
1up, Better Proposals, Breeze Docs, DeepRFP, PowerRFPFive alternatives
1up.ai, Civio, GovDash, Procurement Sciences, TribblePerplexity SonarLoopioagainst: ProposifyProposifyChangedResponsiveBreeze Docsno first choiceagainst: Outlook
One alternative
ResponsiveFive alternatives
Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Responsive, RocketDocs, Upland QvidianSeven alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, AutogenAI, GovDash, HeyIris, Loopio, Tribble, Upland QvidianFour alternatives
1up, AutoRFP.ai, DeepRFP, PowerRFPGrok 4.1 FastResponsiveagainst: Upland QvidianPandaDocChangedResponsivePowerRFPResponsiveagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive, Storyflow, Upland Qvidian
One alternative
LoopioThree alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, QwilrFive alternatives
Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, Tribble, Upland QvidianOne alternative
1upFour alternatives
1up, Arphie, Loopio, Upland QvidianMistral SmallLoopio, ResponsivePandaDocChangedResponsivePowerRFPno first choiceagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Storyflow
Two alternatives
Expedience Proposal Software, ProposifyThree alternatives
Expedience Proposal Software, Monday.com, ProposifyFour alternatives
1up, Loopio, Thalamus AI, Upland QvidianOne alternative
Breeze DocsDeepSeek V4 FlashLoopioPandaDocChangedResponsiveagainst: PandaDoc, ProposifyDeepRFPagainst: AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, Responsiveno first choiceagainst: Loopio, PandaDocnothing named
Four alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Proposify, QorusDocs, ResponsiveThree alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrSeven alternatives
Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, DeepRFP, Loopio, SiftHub, Thalamus AI, Upland QvidianFive alternatives
Better Proposals, Inventive AI, PandaDoc, PowerRFP, ProposifyLlama 4 MaverickExpedience Proposal SoftwareExpedience Proposal SoftwareHeldno first choiceDeepRFPno first choiceagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Storyflow
Two alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, ConveyorFour alternatives
PandaDoc, Proposify, QuoteWerks, QwilrTwo alternatives
RFPMonkey, VisibleThreadQwen 3.7 FlashAutoRFP.ai, LoopioPandaDocChangedLoopioBreeze DocsLoopioagainst: Gainsight, PandaDoc, Vendavoagainst: Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive
Two alternatives
Qwilr, Upland QvidianThree alternatives
Expedience Proposal Software, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
Responsive, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
1up, PowerRFPTwo alternatives
Responsive, Upland QvidianKimi K2LoopioPandaDocChangedLoopioagainst: PandaDocBreezeDocs, DeepRFPagainst: GovWin IQno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Loopio, PandaDoc, ProposalKit / Proposal Central, Proposify, Qwilr, Upland Qvidian, XaitPorter
Three alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, PandaDoc, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Responsive, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
BidSparq, PandaDocGLM 4.7 FlashXLoopioPandaDoc, QwilrChangedno first choicePowerRFPno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, BidMagic, ChatGPT, Claude, DocMerge, PandaDoc, Proposify, Storyflow
Two alternatives
Responsive, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
Proposable, ProposifyTwo alternatives
BidSparq, ProposifyMiniMax M2.5Loopio, ResponsivePandaDocChangedLoopioBreeze Docs, PowerRFPResponsiveagainst: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, PandaDoc, Proposify, Storyflow
Two alternatives
SiftHub, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
Inventive AI, Proposify, Responsive, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
1up, BidScriptThree alternatives
Loopio, Tribble, Upland QvidianGPT-6 LunaLoopioLoopio, ProposifyChangedLoopio1upno first choicenothing named
One alternative
ResponsiveOne alternative
PandaDocFive alternatives
AutogenAI, Conveyor, Ombud, Responsive, Upland QvidianOne alternative
LoopioMuse Glimmer 30BLoopioPandaDocChangedLoopio, Responsive formerly RFPIOPowerRFPLoopio, Responsiveagainst: Arphie, Loopio, Responsive
Two alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, ResponsiveFour alternatives
GetAccept, Loopio, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
QorusDocs, Tribble, Upland QvidianThree alternatives
Bidhive, PandaDoc, RFP360.AIOne alternative
Upland QvidianBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:48 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:12 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 25 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:29 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:53 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 9 | 91 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:43 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 9 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:43 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 21 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:23 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 20 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:15 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:08 | yes | 12 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:09 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:22 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:08 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:09 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:23 | yes | 15 | 83 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:15 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 2 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:14 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:56 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:51 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Inventive read as Inventive AI
Unresolved, counted raw
BidMagic
BidScript
Bidhive
Civio AI
DocMerge
Google Docs/Sheets
GovWin IQ
Perceptis AI
ProposalKit / Proposal Central
ProposalPro
RFP.co
RFP360.AI
RFPMonkey
RequestFX
SmartDocs
Sweetspot
Tenderos
Thalamus
Tradogram
Workday Sourcing
Zip
Zyno RFP
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
Follow RFP response software
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this category moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.