Every category where a model named Qwilr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Proposal software	Revenue operations	4%	4 of 79	7%	44	accepted challenger
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	56 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	23 of 59	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qwilr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qwilr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	3	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	3	1	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	4	1	0	5
Kimi K2	1	2	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	3	1	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct25 labels2

Paraphrase21 labelsNone

Comparative28 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labelsNone

Scale-constrained16 labels1

Negative21 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative124 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, PandaDoc or Qwilr offer the best balance of features, pricing, and scalability.” Kimi K2 · Proposals · direct prompt · first choice

“Proposify or Qwilr are the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Proposals · direct prompt · first choice

“Go with Qwilr if you want to improve the aesthetics and conversion rates of your proposals immediately.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · direct prompt · alternative

“Qwilr or GetAccept if a WOW-factor buyer experience is central to your sales motion” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proposals · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools like Qwilr are incredibly modern... However, they require caution depending on your industry.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative

“Limited template library; fewer automation options; limited integrations compared to competitors” Kimi K2 · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative

“Be cautious of general-purpose platforms like Proposify, Qwilr, and PandaDoc” Llama 4 Maverick · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qwilr, over the 124 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qwilr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc115 of 12454Compare →

Proposify104 of 1246Compare →

Better Proposals70 of 1248Not in the top three

Loopio44 of 1248Not in the top three

GetAccept41 of 1241Not in the top three

Responsive36 of 1248Not in the top three

DealHub34 of 1245Not in the top three

Bonsai21 of 1240Not in the top three

Conga16 of 1240Not in the top three

Nusii16 of 1240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qwilr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 124 answers that named Qwilr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qwilr.comYour site12

pandadoc.com11

g2.com9

getaccept.com9

proposify.com9

autogenai.com7

flowcase.com7

lindy.ai7

guideflow.com6

sifthub.io6

Seventy-one of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Qwilr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getaccept.com/blog/proposal-software8

lindy.ai/blog/proposal-software7

autogenai.com/blog/best-proposal-management-software6

sifthub.io/blog/best-proposal-software-tools6

flowcase.com/blog/top-10-proposal-management-software-for-small-businesses-20265

guideflow.com/blog/best-proposal-software5

oneflow.com/blog/best-proposal-management-software5

qwilr.com/blog/best-proposal-automation-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Qwilr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qwilr; a claim can dispute any of them.

Qwilr Starter 1

The company

Qwilr.

Website: qwilr.com
Headquarters: Redfern, Australia
Founded: 2014

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qwilr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qwilr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qwilr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.