Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 22 of 60
6 categories · RankedQwilr
177Judge labels
3First choices
23Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Proposals for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 73 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Qwilr →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 62
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market13 of 73
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In sales rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Qwilr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 2% | 13 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 2% | 12 of 82 | 8% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 9 of 56 | 6% | 47 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 108 of 116 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 0% | 18 of 66 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 57% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| PR and media monitoring | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 47 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Qwilr held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales rooms · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 23 → 12 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 9 of 56 |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 13 of 73 |
| RFP response | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 82, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 108 of 116, unchanged |
| CPQ | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 18 of 66 |
| PR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 47, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Qwilr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Qwilr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct37 labels1
Paraphrase48 labels1
Comparative39 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative26 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative177 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Why it’s top-tier: It creates content that looks and acts exactly like a website... Mid-Market Fit: Highly rated for ease of use and flexibility.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · direct prompt · first choice
“Tools like Responsive or Qwilr often rank higher for balanced features without as many gripes.” Grok 4.20 · Proposals · negative prompt · first choice
“Qwilr as the strongest choice for interactive, web-style proposals” Perplexity Sonar · Proposals · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with PandaDoc or Qwilr” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RFP response · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid Qwilr if you need quick team onboarding or gradual pricing scaling” Kimi K2 · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“users frequently complain about "rigid editing blocks" ... locks its Salesforce integration behind an Enterprise tier” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative
“proposal automation tools like PandaDoc and Qwilr ... do not directly support the core functions of value selling” Mistral Small · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“G2 reviews mention limitations in formatting, customization, and some integrations.” GPT-6 Luna · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qwilr, over the 177 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qwilr was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qwilr, over the 177 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qwilr was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qwilr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 167 of the 177 answers that named Qwilr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qwilr.comYour site102
pandadoc.com90
getaccept.com72
proposify.com68
g2.com67
guideflow.com67
responsive.io62
monday.com61
sifthub.io41
albato.com31
559 of the 661 domain citations in answers naming Qwilr came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
qwilr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qwilr takes 2% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
qwilr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qwilr takes 2% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital sales room platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital sales room platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“qwilr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,837 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,284 · 200 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,848
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 73 in sales rooms
Segment leader
29%
Dock
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 177 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 167 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on qwilr.com
1,142
subdomains included
Content
631
counted in the table below
Documentation
251
Product · Integration
16 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 360 | 20 | 2026-09-24 | Proposals, CRM | |
| Template or tool | 159 | 0 | 2021-09-01 | CRM, SEO | |
| Case study | 43 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-01-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-10-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2021-10-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2024-02-17 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Mcp for sales teams blog
- 2026-09-23New 7 proposal prompts to try with the qwilr mcp blog
- 2026-09-22New your gong calls now automatically personalize your proposals blog
- 2026-09-18New automate zoho crm tasks with qwilr blog
- 2026-09-15Consolidate proposal esignature payment tools blog
- 2026-09-15Integrate proposal workflows salesforce blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page qwilr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Qwilr
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Qwilr.ShowHide
The company
Qwilr.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- qwilr.com
- Headquarters
- Redfern, Australia
- Founded
- 2014
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- proposal software for modern sales teams
- For
- modern sales teams; all your GTM teams
- Price stated
- Starter: $35 USD per user/month annual billing; Growth: $275 USD per month includes 5 users annual billing only; Scale: $750 USD per month includes 10 users annual billing only qwilr.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 35 qwilr.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- No credit card required | 14 day free trial qwilr.com
- Integrations claimed
- 9 qwilr.com/partners
- Customers named
- LaunchNotesBrisant SecureLorikeetVerbateDilshi GunasekaraJake BreretonAlex DuttonGrant Dewar
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Qwilr's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: qwilr.com, qwilr.com/pricing, qwilr.com/product/esign, qwilr.com/case-studies, qwilr.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qwilr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qwilr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qwilr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Qwilr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qwilr, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.