3 categories · RankedProposify
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 13% | 2 of 79 | 17% | 54 | accepted challenger |
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 2% | 6 of 73 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62% |
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 50 of 65 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“my default pick would be Proposify if you want a balanced mix of proposal creation, approvals, tracking, and CRM-friendly workflow” GPT-5.4 mini · Proposals · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Proposify or Qwilr are the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Proposals · direct prompt · first choice
“the best sales proposal and quote document tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Proposify” Llama 4 Maverick · Proposals · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Proposify - ranks as best overall for Configure, Price, Quote (CPQ) at $19-$49/month.” Llama 4 Maverick · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Proposify — Multiple Critical Issues ... Proposify and SAP Ariba have the most severe and well-documented problems.” Kimi K2 · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequent reports of poor customer service ... Trustpilot rating ~2.3/5; some call it "buggy and unusable."” Grok 4.1 Fast · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Predatory billing practices - Charging after cancellation, making refunds nearly impossible” Mistral Small · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious of general-purpose platforms like Proposify, Qwilr, and PandaDoc if you need SF330 compliance” Llama 4 Maverick · Proposals · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 185 answers that named Proposify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Ninety-two of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Proposify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Proposify
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proposify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proposify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at proposify.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.