Every category where a model named Proposify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	5%	6 of 82	28%	32	criticized challenger
CPQ	Revenue operations	2%	7 of 66	8%	12	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	10 of 56	15%	59	accepted challenger	▼−13Since September 2026: 13% → 0%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	41 of 73	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Value selling tools	Sales	0%	44 of 116	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	48 of 63	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 23%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Proposify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Proposify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	5	2	0	7
GPT-5.4 mini	1	3	0	0	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	1	2	7
Perplexity Sonar	1	3	1	1	6
Grok 4.20	0	5	2	2	9
Mistral Small	1	5	0	2	8
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	6	2	2	10
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	2	2	7
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	6	2	1	9
Kimi K2	0	5	1	2	8
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	5	2	2	9
MiniMax M2.5	0	7	3	1	11
GPT-6 Luna	1	2	0	1	4
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	5	3	1	9

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct44 labels1

Paraphrase60 labels4

Comparative60 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained36 labels3

Scale-constrained28 labels1

Negative59 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative287 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd generally recommend Proposify as the default choice.” GPT-5.4 mini · RFP response · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Proposify as the default choice” Perplexity Sonar · RFP response · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with Proposify for sales proposals” GPT-6 Luna · RFP response · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“General proposal tools like Proposify and PandaDoc: These excel at sales proposals but fall short for true RFPs.” Grok 4.20 · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“Proposify and PandaDoc - They are proposal tools rather than RFP tools, and the difference matters.” Llama 4 Maverick · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“Proposify and PandaDoc are frequently cited as problematic choices for RFP response work” Kimi K2 · RFP response · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Proposify if you need contract management or have high proposal volume” Kimi K2 · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Proposify, over the 287 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Proposify was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc263 of 287120Compare →

Qwilr141 of 2875Compare →

Loopio97 of 28721Compare →

Better Proposals92 of 2878Not among the top eight

Responsive87 of 28721Compare →

DealHub43 of 28711Compare →

Upland Qvidian43 of 2871Not among the top eight

QuoteWerks38 of 2875Compare →

GetAccept33 of 2871Not among the top eight

Salesforce Revenue Cloud29 of 2873Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Proposify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 274 of the 287 answers that named Proposify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pandadoc.com136

guideflow.com119

g2.com110

qwilr.com110

responsive.io106

getaccept.com93

proposify.comYour site89

monday.com86

sifthub.io80

inventive.ai68

908 of the 997 domain citations in answers naming Proposify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

responsive.io/blog/best-proposal-software-comparison75

getaccept.com/blog/proposal-software66

qwilr.com/blog/best-proposal-automation-software64

guideflow.com/blog/best-proposal-software61

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/best-proposal-management-software61

g2.com/categories/proposal54

pandadoc.com/blog/proposal-software51

sifthub.io/blog/best-proposal-software-tools46

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

proposify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Proposify takes 5% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“proposify”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 28 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 38,103 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,613 · 527 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,440
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

29 ads · 29 text · 27 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Proposify, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 14 in the year, 15 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 82 in RFP response

Segment leader

25%

Loopio

First choices: 9 across its categories
Named in: 287 answers
Its own site cited: in 274 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on proposify.com

660

subdomains included

Content

475

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

10 · 15

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	417	4	2026-09-15
Comparison	26	2	2026-09-15
Case study	16	undated
Glossary or explainer	6	0	2025-11-05
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
News or press	2	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-15Learn how to write and present a pricing proposal with confidence. discover what to include how to structure pricing com blog
2026-09-15Clientpoint alternatives comparison
2026-09-08Statement of work vs proposal comparison
2026-09-08Is proposify right for you blog
2026-08-18Best sales closing productivity tools blog
2026-08-18Sales closing statistics blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page proposify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Proposify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Proposify; a claim can dispute any of them.

Proposify Basic 1

Follow Proposify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Proposify is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Proposal Software to Streamline Your Sales Process
proposify.com
For: sales teams
proposify.com
Price stated: Basic, Team, Business proposify.com
Starting price: 19 proposify.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start free trial proposify.com
Certifications: GDPRSOC2 Type 2PCI-DSS
Customers named: FernSeraphEverLineWe Treat360cleanAbdoADT CybersecurityDimensional Innovations
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Proposify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: proposify.com, proposify.com/pricing, trust.proposify.com, proposify.com/platform/api, proposify.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proposify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proposify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Proposify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Proposify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Proposify, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.