RFP response software for small business buyers
Asked as “RFP response software”, and as “proposal management software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · DeepRFP 16%
33PandaDoc16DeepRFP14PowerRFP37others
33% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Loopio vs ProposifyLoopio vs AutoRFP.aiLoopio vs 1upLoopio vs QwilrPandaDoc vs ResponsivePandaDoc vs DeepRFPPandaDoc vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs AutoRFP.aiPandaDoc vs 1upPandaDoc vs QwilrResponsive vs DeepRFPResponsive vs ProposifyResponsive vs AutoRFP.aiResponsive vs 1upResponsive vs QwilrDeepRFP vs ProposifyDeepRFP vs AutoRFP.aiDeepRFP vs 1upDeepRFP vs QwilrProposify vs AutoRFP.aiProposify vs 1upProposify vs QwilrAutoRFP.ai vs 1upAutoRFP.ai vs Qwilr1up vs Qwilr
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01PandaDoc33%
PandaDoc33%02DeepRFP16%
DeepRFP16%03PowerRFP14%
PowerRFP14%04Inventive AI4%
Inventive AI4%05Proposify4%
Proposify4%06Loopio4%
Loopio4%07Responsive4%
Responsive4%08AutoRFP.ai2%
AutoRFP.ai2%091up2%
1up2%10Better Proposals2%
Better Proposals2%11SiftHub0%
SiftHub0%12Qwilr0%
Qwilr0%13Arphie0%
Arphie0%14Upland Qvidian0%
Upland Qvidian0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Loopio55%
24 of 44 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Loopio and Responsive start at $20,000 per year and assume you have a proposal operations function to run them, making them oversized” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Responsive57%
25 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“**Avoid Enterprise Tools:** Tools like **Loopio**, **Qvidian**, or **RFPIO** ... are generally overkill for small companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt
Upland Qvidian75%
15 of 20 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“**Avoid Enterprise Tools:** Tools like **Loopio**, **Qvidian**, or **RFPIO** ... are generally overkill for small companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt
Proposify29%
9 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools like PandaDoc and Proposify are fantastic for sending out standard, beautiful, web-based sales pitches and contracts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1011 links across 131 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Responsive51 answers · 104 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Inventive49 answers · 98 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SiftHub45 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · BidSparq31 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow29 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DeepRFP25 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Loopio17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Storyflow17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · AutoRFP.ai15 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Vercor15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best rfp response software”, “rfp response software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 33% | 527 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | |
| DeepRFP deeprfp.com | 16% | 38 | 170 | 0 | 677 | |||
| PowerRFP powerrfp.com | 14% | 19 | 10 | 0 | 79 | 2 | ||
| BreezeDocs breezedocs.ai Breeze Docs 4%, BreezeDocs 2% | 6% | 12 | ||||||
| Inventive AI inventive.ai | 4% | 50 | 260 | 558 | 9,514 | $694 | 4 | 7 |
| Proposify proposify.com | 4% | 274 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | ||
| Loopio loopio.com | 4% | 220 | 3,600 | 80 | 4,640 | 26 | ||
| Responsive responsive.io | 4% | 213 | 12,100 | 210,141 | 37,620 | 16 | 5 | |
| AutoRFP autorfp.ai AutoRFP.ai 2%, AutoRFP 2% | 4% | 76 | 70 | 0 | 38,771 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1up 1up.ai | 2% | 26 | 18,100 | 3,797 | 10,732 | $293 | 22 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 13 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (autorfp.ai, inventive.ai, responsive.io, sifthub.io). The first result for “best rfp response software” is kantiv.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best RFP response software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which proposal management software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top RFP response tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best RFP response software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a RFP response software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which RFP response tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DeepRFP, Inventive AIPandaDocChangedDeepRFPPowerRFPno first choiceagainst: Arphie, Loopio, Proposable, Proposify, Responsive
One alternative
ResponsiveThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
AutoRFP AI, HeyIrisThree alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, DeepRFP, QorusDocsGPT-5.4 miniResponsivePandaDocChangedLoopioagainst: Upland QvidianRFP Response Builderno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, Tribble, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ResponsiveOne alternative
LoopioGemini 3.5 FlashDeepRFPagainst: Loopio, ResponsivePandaDocChangedAutoRFP.aiagainst: Loopio, ResponsiveCoblagainst: Loopio, ResponsiveSteerlabagainst: Loopio, Responsiveagainst: Better Proposals, Loopio, Ombud, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Four alternatives
1up.ai, AutoRFP.ai, SiftHub, VercorFour alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, Prospero, QwilrFour alternatives
1up.ai, Arphie, SiftHub, Winify AIFive alternatives
1up.ai, Bidara, DeepRFP, PandaDoc, ProposifyThree alternatives
1up, AutoRFP.ai, SiftHubPerplexity SonarAutoRFP.ai, Inventive AIPandaDocChangedDeepRFP, Responsiveagainst: QorusDocsPowerRFPagainst: Loopio, Responsiveno first choiceagainst: 1up.ai, AutoRFP.ai, Conveyor, Loopio, Ombud, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Two alternatives
Proposify, SiftHubOne alternative
Better ProposalsThree alternatives
Loopio, Thalamus AI, TribbleTwo alternatives
Breeze Docs, DeepRFPGrok 4.1 FastPandaDoc, Proposifyagainst: Loopio, ResponsivePandaDocChangedAutoRFP.ai, Inventive AIagainst: PandaDoc, ProposifyPowerRFPagainst: AutoRFP.aino first choiceagainst: Arphie, Loopio, Ombud, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive, Upland Qvidian, Vendorful
Two alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, DeepRFPThree alternatives
Better Proposals, Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
DeepRFP, Loopio, ResponsiveOne alternative
1upMistral SmallBreeze DocsPandaDocChanged1up, Arphie, Tribbleagainst: LoopioPowerRFPno first choiceagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify
Two alternatives
1up, SteerlabTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, ProposifyTwo alternatives
Inventive AI, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ProposifySeven alternatives
DocuSign Gen, GetAccept, Loopio, PandaDoc, Prospero, Responsive, Upland QvidianDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDocagainst: ResponsivePandaDocHeldBidSparq, DeepRFP, RFP MatrixDeepRFPagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland QvidianAutoRFPagainst: Responsive, Upland Qvidianagainst: Bonfire, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, JAGGAER, Loopio, ProcureNow, Responsive, SAP Ariba, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
1up, Breeze Docs, LoopioTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, ProposifyTwo alternatives
Loopio, ResponsiveThree alternatives
BidSparq, PandaDoc, PowerRFPThree alternatives
DeepRFP, Loopio, SiftHubLlama 4 MaverickDeepRFPno first choiceChangedno first choicePowerRFPno first choiceagainst: Ombud
Three alternatives
Breeze Docs, SiftHub, SteerlabTwo alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Responsive.ioQwen 3.7 FlashDeepRFPagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland QvidianPandaDocChangedInventive AILoopiono first choiceagainst: Salesforce CPQ, VLocateagainst: Asana, Monday.com, Responsive, Trello, Upland Qvidian
Two alternatives
Breeze Docs, SteerlabTwo alternatives
Better Proposals, QwilrFour alternatives
Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, DeepRFP, Responsive.ioThree alternatives
Kiflo, Proposify, ResponseFoxKimi K2BreezeDocs, DeepRFPagainst: AutoRFP.ai, Loopio, ResponsivePandaDocChangedArphie, DeepRFPagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland QvidianPandaDocagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidianno first choiceagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Two alternatives
PandaDoc, VercorFour alternatives
Better Proposals, GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrFour alternatives
1up, BidSparq, Inventive AI, PandaDocThree alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Better Proposals, DeepRFPGLM 4.7 FlashXBidSparq, PowerRFPPandaDocChangedBidaraagainst: AutoRFP.ai, LoopioPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive
Two alternatives
PandaDoc, SiftHubTwo alternatives
Proposify, QwilrThree alternatives
Arphie, BidSparq, SiftHubTwo alternatives
BidSparq, TenderOS - Tender AnalyzerMiniMax M2.5Breeze Docs, ResponsivePandaDoc, ProposifyChangedDeepRFPPandaDocLoopioagainst: PandaDoc, Proposifyagainst: Loopio, Ombud, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
One alternative
SteerlabThree alternatives
FreshBooks, QuoteWerks, QwilrThree alternatives
1up, AutoRFP.ai, Inventive AITwo alternatives
Better Proposals, BidSparqOne alternative
ResponsiveGPT-6 Luna1upBetter ProposalsChangedDeepRFPDeepRFPagainst: Loopiono first choiceagainst: Loopio, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
Conveyor, Loopio, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, QwilrThree alternatives
Conveyor, Loopio, ResponsiveOne alternative
Breeze DocsMuse Glimmer 30BDeepRFPPandaDocChangedagainst: Qwilr1upPowerRFPagainst: SAM.govno first choiceagainst: Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Five alternatives
1up, AutoRFP.ai, PandaDoc, Proposify, ResponsiveOne alternative
ProposifyFive alternatives
Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, QorusDocs, ResponsiveOne alternative
DeepRFPBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:21 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 16 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 14 | 103 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:19 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 23 | 52 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 8 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 19 | 45 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 22 | 128 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 4 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:20 | yes | 27 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:51 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 16 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:31 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:48 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:20 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 4 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:26 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:08 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 18 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 1 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Inventive read as Inventive AI
Unresolved, counted raw
AutoRFP AI
Google Docs + Templates
HeyIris.ai
Loopio Foundations
ProcureNow
RFP Matrix
RFPdb
Relevance AI RFP Agent
ResponseFox
Responsive AI
TenderOS - Tender Analyzer
VLocate
Winify AI
Word/Excel
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.