Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 17 of 52
2 categories · RankedSiftHub
23Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in RFP response for small business buyers
Rank 28 of 56 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business39 of 53
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 56
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise24 of 67
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In proposals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SiftHub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 28 of 56 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 32 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SiftHub held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proposals · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 26 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 22 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 28 of 56 |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SiftHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SiftHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pulls answers from live internal systems rather than a manually maintained Q&A library.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative
“4. SiftHub (Newer Alternative)” MiniMax M2.5 · RFP response · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SiftHub, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SiftHub was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SiftHub, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SiftHub was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SiftHub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named SiftHub and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sifthub.ioYour site22
inventive.ai14
responsive.io13
g2.com11
loopio.com10
learn.g2.com9
arphie.ai7
autogenai.com7
autorfp.ai7
bidsparq.com7
Eighty-five of the 107 domain citations in answers naming SiftHub came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sifthub.io ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SiftHub takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 65%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sifthub.io ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SiftHub takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 65%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “proposal software”
9
Position for “best proposal software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“sifthub”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 17,832 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,835 · 103 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 477
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 56 in proposals
Segment leader
65%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sifthub.io
650
subdomains included
Content
576
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 16
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 317 | 27 | 2026-08-20 | Proposals, BI & dashboards | |
| Glossary or explainer | 170 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ABM | |
| Comparison | 27 | 5 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Podcast or video | 26 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 14 | 0 | 2025-11-06 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2026-03-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-20Rfp best practices blog
- 2026-08-20Rfp process blog
- 2026-08-20Sdr meaning sales blog
- 2026-08-10Autogenai alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-10Best enterprise rfp response software blog
- 2026-08-10Proposal rfp response workflow software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sifthub.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SiftHub
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SiftHub is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SiftHub is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI RFP software and deal orchestration platform
- For
- presales and revenue teams
- Price stated
- Custom pricing based on team size and usage. sifthub.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available. sifthub.io
- Integrations claimed
- 8 sifthub.io/features/sift-ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022ISO CertifiedSOC2 CertifiedVAPT CertifiedISO 27001
- Customers named
- SirionRocketlaneAllegoZycusActivtrakSuperhumanWhatfixCongruent Solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What SiftHub's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sifthub.io, sifthub.io/pricing, trust.sifthub.io, sifthub.io/features/sift-ai, sifthub.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SiftHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SiftHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SiftHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SiftHub is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SiftHub, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.