Every category where a model named DeepRFP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	7%	5 of 82	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DeepRFP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DeepRFP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels6

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels6

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best RFP response software for a company with a limited budget is DeepRFP, as it is the low-friction choice for freelancers or very small teams on a tight budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice

“DeepRFP and iQuoteXpress offer the most transparent, truly affordable pricing for budget-conscious companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice

“My recommendation: Start with DeepRFP or BreezeDocs if you need AI assistance” Kimi K2 · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice

“My single best recommendation for a company with a limited budget: DeepRFP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DeepRFP, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DeepRFP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Loopio25 of 381Compare →

Responsive25 of 381Compare →

AutoRFP.ai17 of 381Compare →

PandaDoc16 of 382Compare →

Proposify13 of 381Compare →

PowerRFP10 of 385Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian10 of 381Not among the top eight

1up10 of 380Compare →

Inventive AI9 of 382Not among the top eight

Arphie8 of 380Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DeepRFP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named DeepRFP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inventive.ai31

deeprfp.comYour site25

sifthub.io24

responsive.io23

g2.com21

guideflow.com19

bidsparq.com18

learn.g2.com12

loopio.com11

autorfp.ai10

169 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming DeepRFP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sifthub.io/blog/rfp-software-for-small-business21

inventive.ai/blog-posts/best-rfp-software20

guideflow.com/blog/rfp-software19

bidsparq.com/blog/rfp-management-software18

inventive.ai/blog-posts/top-rfp-software-small-businesses-startups17

deeprfp.com/15

deeprfp.com/blog/best-rfp-tools-comparison12

learn.g2.com/best-rfp-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

deeprfp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, DeepRFP takes 7% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 170 a month (“deeprfp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 677 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 126 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 640
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 82 in RFP response

Segment leader

25%

Loopio

First choices: 12 across its categories
Named in: 38 answers
Its own site cited: in 38 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on deeprfp.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-10 to 2026-09	Latest	Categories named
Blog	21	0		2026-05-29

Most recent

2026-05-29Deeprfp reviews pricing evaluation blog
2026-03-31Rfq versus rfp differences use cases and response strategy blog
2026-03-31Respond to an rfp step by step playbook blog
2026-03-31Go no go decision a 30 minute rfp framework blog
2026-03-31Request for proposal rfp meaning format basics blog
2026-03-31Templates for rfp examples and ai drafts blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page deeprfp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow DeepRFP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

DeepRFP is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI RFP Software and Response Automation Platform
deeprfp.com
For: small business owners, proposal consultants, and lean proposal teams
deeprfp.com
Price stated: DeepRFP is just $89 per user per month—billed monthly, cancel anytime. deeprfp.com
Starting price: 89 deeprfp.com
Free plan or trial: seven-day free RFP software trial deeprfp.com
Certifications: SOC 2-compliant US clouds
Hosting: US
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, customers

What DeepRFP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: deeprfp.com, deeprfp.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DeepRFP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DeepRFP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DeepRFP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DeepRFP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DeepRFP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.