AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › PowerRFP · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

PowerRFP

19Judge labels
12First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in RFP response for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PowerRFP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
RFP response softwareSales9%4 of 820%9under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PowerRFP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PowerRFP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained16 labels11
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best budget-conscious option: PowerRFP, for smaller teams and procurement groups that want AI-assisted RFP workflows without a large commitment.” Muse Glimmer 30B · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Breeze Docs or PowerRFP as they are specifically mentioned as cost-effective solutions for small businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice
“PowerRFP is widely considered the best option for a company with a limited budget because it offers a functional free plan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice
“PowerRFP stands out as the best RFP response software based on current reviews and pricing data” Grok 4.1 Fast · RFP response · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PowerRFP, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PowerRFP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DeepRFP10 of 193Not among the top eight
1up8 of 190Not among the top eight
Responsive7 of 191Not among the top eight
Loopio7 of 190Not among the top eight
PandaDoc7 of 190Not among the top eight
Breeze Docs6 of 192Not among the top eight
AutoRFP.ai6 of 190Not among the top eight
Proposify6 of 190Not among the top eight
BidSparq4 of 190Not among the top eight
Better Proposals3 of 190Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PowerRFP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named PowerRFP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com18
inventive.ai15
sifthub.io14
responsive.io12
deeprfp.com11
learn.g2.com10
bidsparq.com9
g2.com9
sourceforge.net9
powerrfp.comYour site8

107 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming PowerRFP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

powerrfp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PowerRFP takes 9% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “rfp response software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best rfp response software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
10 a month (“powerrfp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 79 a month
Searches its site ranks for
31 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it
409
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 6 text, 4 image, 2 video · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2022, as Power Information Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 82 in RFP response
Segment leader
25%
Loopio
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
19 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on powerrfp.com
71
subdomains included
Content
33
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1712026-08-20
Report or ebook13undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Template or tool112026-09-25
Glossary or explainer102025-11-01
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page powerrfp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow PowerRFP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

PowerRFP is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free RFP software with vendor management built in.
For
small businesses
Price stated
Starter: US$ 0 /month. Pro: US$ 25 /billed yearly or $35/month, billed monthly. 30-day free trial. powerrfp.com
Starting price
US$ 0 /month powerrfp.com
Free plan or trial
Starter is free; Pro includes a 30-day free trial. powerrfp.com
Customers named
Patrick TurnerCentennial Real Estate
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What PowerRFP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: powerrfp.com, powerrfp.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PowerRFP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PowerRFP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PowerRFP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where PowerRFP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name PowerRFP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at powerrfp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.