Every category where a model named Arphie for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	0%	19 of 82	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	20 of 56	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Arphie yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Arphie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative15 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look for AI-native tools (e.g., *Arphie*, *Inventive AI*, or *1up*) that pull dynamically from your actual live repositories” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RFP response · negative prompt · alternative

“Arphie is built for strict reviewer workflows where humans must verify the AI's math and citations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best when source-backed answers, live company knowledge, and reviewer trust matter most” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

“Focuses on providing clear source citations for every AI-generated answer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the tool relies on uncurated data and a single confidence score to measure quality... The caution is therefore around content governance and version control” Muse Glimmer 30B · RFP response · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arphie, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arphie was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Responsive29 of 339Not among the top eight

Loopio29 of 335Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian19 of 332Not among the top eight

AutoRFP.ai17 of 333Not among the top eight

Inventive AI12 of 335Not among the top eight

DeepRFP8 of 334Not among the top eight

PandaDoc8 of 331Not among the top eight

Proposify8 of 330Not among the top eight

SiftHub6 of 331Not among the top eight

1up5 of 330Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arphie. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Arphie and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inventive.ai26

responsive.io20

arphie.aiYour site19

g2.com18

sifthub.io18

guideflow.com14

autorfp.ai13

loopio.com13

bidsparq.com12

learn.g2.com12

146 of the 165 domain citations in answers naming Arphie came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

inventive.ai/blog-posts/best-rfp-software14

bidsparq.com/blog/rfp-management-software12

guideflow.com/blog/rfp-software12

learn.g2.com/best-rfp-software12

storyflow.so/blog/best-rfp-response-tools-202611

wifitalents.com/best/rfp-response-software11

arphie.ai/blog/top-5-rfp-tools-for-streamlining-your-proposal-process10

1up.ai/blog/the-best-rfp-software-buyers-guide9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

arphie.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Arphie takes 0% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best rfp response software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 320 a month (“arphie”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 9,807 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 981 · 87 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 557
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

20 ads · 20 text · 13 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Arphie, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 82 in RFP response

Segment leader

25%

Loopio

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 33 answers
Its own site cited: in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on arphie.ai

627

subdomains included

Content

536

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 15

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	393	undated	Proposals
Blog	107	undated	Proposals
Comparison	16	undated
Case study	13	undated
Template or tool	6	undated
Conference or event	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page arphie.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Arphie

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Arphie is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Arphie is an AI-native platform that automates responses to RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs for sales, presales, security, and investor relations teams.
arphie.ai
For: GTM teams
arphie.ai
Integrations claimed: 7 arphie.ai
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2 complianceSOC 2 Type 2Zero Data Retention (ZDR)
Customers named: CyberhavenRecorded FutureBillingPlatformBetterworksIvoOfficeSpace Software
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Arphie's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: arphie.ai, arphie.ai/security, arphie.ai/platform, arphie.ai/case-studies, arphie.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arphie's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arphie, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Arphie by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Arphie is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Arphie, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.