Every category where a model named DealHub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	62%	1 of 73	2%	46	endorsed leader
Proposal software	Revenue operations	2%	8 of 79	6%	18	accepted challenger
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	10 of 59	22%	32	accepted challenger
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	19 of 65	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%
Referral and partner programs	Partner and channel	0%	90 of 107	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	55 of 75	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DealHub yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DealHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	2	0	6
GPT-5.4 mini	3	3	1	0	7
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	4	1	1	9
Perplexity Sonar	3	1	1	1	6
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	6	4	1	13
Mistral Small	3	2	2	2	9
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	4	2	1	10
Llama 4 Maverick	2	2	5	0	9
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	3	2	2	9
Kimi K2	4	2	2	1	9
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	3	2	1	9
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	5	0	8

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct54 labels14

Paraphrase58 labels18

Comparative65 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained25 labels4

Scale-constrained37 labels10

Negative39 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative278 labels in all, every segment counted; 46 of the 50 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A massive mid-market favorite. It is zero-code, incredibly fast to implement, natively integrates with Salesforce/HubSpot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · scale prompt · first choice

“Best for speed of rollout: DealHub because multiple sources highlight quick deployment and no-code setup.” Perplexity Sonar · CPQ · comparative prompt · first choice

“Default pick: DealHub — it's purpose-built for mid-market B2B, has the best reviews, deploys fast” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · direct prompt · first choice

“DealHub | Tech-forward mid-market | Guided selling, DealRoom, fast deploy | $60-83/user/mo” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CPQ · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you don't need a full CPQ platform and just want digital sales rooms, this is overkill and potentially problematic. The opaque pricing alone is a major red flag.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid for Mid-Market - DealHub ... Enterprise-focused with custom pricing, heavy implementation” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise tools like GetAccept ($49+, 5-user min) or DealHub (custom)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales rooms · budget prompt · hard negative

“DealHub.io - Due to poor implementation support and high costs” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DealHub, over the 277 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DealHub was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc131 of 27734Compare →

GetAccept97 of 27710Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ80 of 2773Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ76 of 27715Not in the top three

Conga CPQ73 of 2771Not in the top three

Aligned70 of 27722Not in the top three

Trumpet69 of 27721Not in the top three

SAP CPQ68 of 2772Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud59 of 27716Not in the top three

Seismic57 of 2774Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DealHub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 277 answers that named DealHub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com23

g2.com21

gartner.com19

monday.com17

getaccept.com13

learn.g2.com13

pandadoc.com11

dock.us10

zoovu.com10

cincom.com9

146 of the 146 domain citations in answers naming DealHub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software17

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq-software14

gartner.com/reviews/market/configure-price-quote-applications13

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-software10

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq10

zoovu.com/blog/best-cpq-software10

qobra.co/blog/cpq-software9

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as DealHub

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DealHub; a claim can dispute any of them.

DealHub CPQ 20DealHub.io 13DealHub AI 4DealHub (Agilysis) 1DealHub (DealHub.io) 1DealHub.io (DealRoom) 1DealHub/GetAccept 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DealHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DealHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dealhub.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.