| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 57% | 1 of 66 | 9% | 57 | endorsed leader | ▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 8% | 3 of 56 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 112 of 116 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 55 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 41 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposals | 2% | 10% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 3 of 56 |
| CPQ | 62% | 58% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 66, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 112 of 116, unchanged |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 53 → 55 of 76 |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Agile Mid-Market Leader: DealHub.io ... highly rated for mid-market teams because of its no-code RevOps administration and rapid deployment time” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · scale prompt · first choice
“If your mid-market definition involves high deal complexity, multi-product catalogs, or strict margin controls, DealHub is often the top choice.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proposals · direct prompt · first choice
“DealHub is frequently cited as the top choice for mid-market organizations due to its balance of power and ease of use.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · direct prompt · first choice
“DealHub is widely regarded as the best CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · CPQ · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid enterprise-grade CPQs like Salesforce CPQ, Oracle CPQ Cloud, or DealHub initially” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: ... DealHub (~$60)” Grok 4.20 · CPQ · budget prompt · hard negative
“CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) tools like DealHub, Salesforce CPQ, and Conga ... do not directly support the core functions of value selling” Mistral Small · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“CPQ tools (DealHub, Salesforce CPQ, Conga) - Handle pricing logic and contract generation, not value quantification” MiniMax M2.5 · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 175 of the 184 answers that named DealHub and are not a share of its labels.
561 of the 612 domain citations in answers naming DealHub came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1,196 | 15 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Blog | 181 | 6 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 141 | 0 | 2025-05-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 62 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Case study | 51 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 31 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-05-12 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-01 |
Every page dealhub.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What DealHub's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dealhub.io, dealhub.io/pricing, trust.dealhub.io, dealhub.io/platform, dealhub.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DealHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DealHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DealHub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Every AI model in the set recommends DealHub first in CPQ this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
DealHub is among the products AI models recommend first in Proposal software this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.