Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
1 category · RankedExperlogix
30Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CPQ for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Experlogix →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market11 of 66
0%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise16 of 49
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Experlogix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 0% | 11 of 66 | 8% | 24 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Experlogix held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CPQ · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 33 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 11 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Experlogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Experlogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Prioritize tools like DealHub, PandaDoc CPQ, or Experlogix (higher ease-of-use scores)” Grok 4.20 · CPQ · negative prompt · first choice
“if you're a manufacturer with highly complex product configurations, Experlogix or Combeenation may be better suited” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative
“if you need a more traditional mid-market CPQ that G2 specifically calls out as a strong option for mid-market companies” Perplexity Sonar · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative
“Experlogix is the clear winner if you're a manufacturer or distributor with complex product configurations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you need a flexible, quick deployment. The low license cost is offset by the high implementation risk and downtime.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative
“User reviews highlight a clunky interface design and significant delays in configuration loading times.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Experlogix, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Experlogix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Experlogix, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Experlogix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Experlogix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Experlogix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
albato.com20
qobra.co19
monday.com16
guideflow.com15
learn.g2.com15
dealhub.io14
conga.com13
everstage.com13
sybill.ai11
experlogix.comYour site9
136 of the 145 domain citations in answers naming Experlogix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
experlogix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Experlogix takes 0% of first choices and DealHub takes 57%.ShowHide
Search and answers
experlogix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Experlogix takes 0% of first choices and DealHub takes 57%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cpq software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best cpq software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“experlogix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,736 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 837 · 22 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,569
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 66 in CPQ
Segment leader
57%
DealHub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on experlogix.com
216
subdomains included
Content
138
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 71 | 2 | 2026-09-04 | CPQ, CRM | |
| Case study | 60 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | CPQ | |
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2023-11-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | CPQ | ||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | CPQ | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-04Blog from online forms to approved documents blog
- 2026-08-25Volvo case study
- 2026-07-30Experlogix smart flows mcp server blog
- 2026-04-23What really matters when your quoting process breaks blog
- 2026-04-08Curo by time4advice case study
- 2025-12-28Swecon 2 case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page experlogix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Experlogix
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Experlogix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Experlogix CPQ 14
Follow Experlogix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Experlogix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Experlogix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Experlogix helps companies accelerate growth by removing the bottlenecks in quoting, documentation, and digital commerce.
- For
- companies
- Customers named
- Thermo FisherCoverysWealthcraftGroupHEALTHKlipspringerTrust Pet Products Ltd.Time ProductsVolvo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Experlogix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: experlogix.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Experlogix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Experlogix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Experlogix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Experlogix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Experlogix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.