Every category where a model named Experlogix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	11 of 73	6%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Experlogix yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Experlogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“another exceptional, deeply integrated choice if your business is run entirely on Microsoft Dynamics 365” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Oracle CPQ or Experlogix — stronger configuration engines for complex products” Kimi K2 · CPQ · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Complex Manufacturing & Physical Products: Experlogix CPQ” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong integration with Microsoft Dynamics; guided configuration” Kimi K2 · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Implementation described as "horrid" with buggy software "not ready for production"” Kimi K2 · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Experlogix, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Experlogix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Salesforce CPQ26 of 296Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ24 of 290Not in the top three

DealHub23 of 297Not in the top three

Conga CPQ23 of 291Not in the top three

SAP CPQ21 of 290Not in the top three

PandaDoc16 of 292Not in the top three

Tacton11 of 290Not in the top three

HubSpot Commerce Hub10 of 290Not in the top three

PROS Smart CPQ10 of 290Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud8 of 291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Experlogix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 29 answers that named Experlogix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cincom.com4

guideflow.com4

qobra.co4

dealhub.io3

blog.alguna.com2

businesswith.com2

conga.com2

cpqconsultant.com2

dock.us2

experlogix.comYour site2

Twenty-five of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Experlogix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools4

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software4

qobra.co/blog/cpq-software4

dealhub.io/blog/cpq/best-cpq-software-20263

businesswith.com/cpq2

cpqconsultant.com/resources/cpq-tools2

dock.us/library/cpq-software2

godlan.com/cpq-software-top-vendors2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Experlogix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Experlogix; a claim can dispute any of them.

Experlogix CPQ 8

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Experlogix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Experlogix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at experlogix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.