Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 52
3 categories · RankedQuoteWerks
88Judge labels
14First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in CPQ for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of QuoteWerks →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 54
14%48 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 66
9%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 49
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named QuoteWerks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 9% | 3 of 66 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 14 of 56 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 47 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, QuoteWerks held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CPQ · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 of 62, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 39 → 8 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | 9% | 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 66, unchanged |
| Proposals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 14 of 56 |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated QuoteWerks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated QuoteWerks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase18 labels2
Comparative17 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels10
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative11 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“QuoteWerks is the best budget pick in the results: it is described as affordable for small sales teams” Perplexity Sonar · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc from ~$19/mo and QuoteWerks from ~$15/mo are the starting points most analysts point to.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuoteWerks because: Lowest entry price ($15/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Pick: QuoteWerks (Starting ~$58–79/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid SMB-only like QuoteWerks.” Grok 4.20 · CPQ · scale prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuoteWerks, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuoteWerks was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuoteWerks, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuoteWerks was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuoteWerks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 88 answers that named QuoteWerks and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com55
pandadoc.com52
qobra.co52
albato.com45
monday.com37
g2.com35
salesbricks.com30
bettercommerce.io23
learn.g2.com22
mobileappdaily.com22
373 of the 373 domain citations in answers naming QuoteWerks came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
quotewerks.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, QuoteWerks takes 9% of first choices and DealHub takes 57%.ShowHide
Search and answers
quotewerks.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, QuoteWerks takes 9% of first choices and DealHub takes 57%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cpq software”
5
Position for “best cpq software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“quotewerks”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 22 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,244 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 714 · 46 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,217
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 3 of 66 in CPQ
Segment leader
57%
DealHub
- First choices
- 14 across its categories
- Named in
- 88 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 84 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on quotewerks.com
1,420
subdomains included
Content
463
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
31 · 25
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 362 | 19 | 2026-09-24 | CPQ, Proposals | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | CPQ | |
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | CRM, CPQ | |
| Conference or event | 10 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Why independence and an open ecosystem matter in modern cpq blog
- 2026-09-22A sales quote is not a document. its a process blog
- 2026-09-21Tips tricks september 2026 quotewerks line types blog
- 2026-09-17Form webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-14Quotewerks web integrations zapier api custom workflows blog
- 2026-09-09Quotewerks cpq recognized as a bettertracker finance category leader for q2 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page quotewerks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as QuoteWerks
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuoteWerks; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quotewerks 1
Follow QuoteWerks
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
QuoteWerks is its own company.ShowHide
The company
QuoteWerks is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales quoting and proposal software solution in its CPQ and Quote-To-Cash sales process
- For
- teams selling configurable products and services
- Price stated
- QuoteWerks Web Pricing quotewerks.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start a Trial quotewerks.com
- Integrations claimed
- 115 quotewerks.com
- Hosting
- WorldwideUnited StatesCanadaUnited KingdomAustraliaNew ZealandSouth Africa
- Customers named
- QuintadenaHilltops ITEquilibrium ConsultingVisionary 360
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications
What QuoteWerks's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quotewerks.com, quotewerks.com/security, quotewerks.com/product, quotewerks.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuoteWerks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuoteWerks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuoteWerks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where QuoteWerks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name QuoteWerks, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where QuoteWerks is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where QuoteWerks is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideQuoteWerks is among the products AI models recommend first in CPQ this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.