AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › CPQ › QuoteWerks vs Proposify
CPQ · October 2026 Edition

QuoteWerks vs Proposify

Zero of fourteen models named QuoteWerks first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. QuoteWerks was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Proposify by eight and QuoteWerks carries 23 labels and Proposify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

QuoteWerks

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Proposify

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2312A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, QuoteWerks reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DealHub was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. DealHub vs QuoteWerks · DealHub vs Proposify · PandaDoc vs QuoteWerks

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
QuoteWerksFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProposify
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Proposify
Budget-constrained51
Scale-constrained001 against QuoteWerks
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, QuoteWerks and Proposify were named in the same answer thirty-eight times, of the 88 answers naming QuoteWerks and the 287 naming Proposify. In those answers Proposify took the first choice four times and QuoteWerks five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where QuoteWerks and Proposify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
QuoteWerks Proposify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, QuoteWerks on the left and Proposify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where QuoteWerks and Proposify stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, NetSuite CPQ, Nue, PandaDoc
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: BetterCommerce, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, PandaDoc
Mistral SmallDealHub
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Zuora CPQ
Qwen 3.7 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Combeenation, Experlogix
MiniMax M2.5DealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
GPT-6 LunaDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Muse Glimmer 30BDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuoteWerks leads by ten points.
QuoteWerks14%#2 of 10
Proposify3%#5 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
QuoteWerks leads by seven points.
QuoteWerks9%#3 of 12
Proposify2%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
QuoteWerks leads by two points.
QuoteWerks2%#– of 9
Proposify0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about QuoteWerks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Avoid SMB-only like QuoteWerks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · hard negative
“QuoteWerks is the best budget pick in the results: it is described as affordable for small sales teams” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc from ~$19/mo and QuoteWerks from ~$15/mo are the starting points most analysts point to.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuoteWerks because: Lowest entry price ($15/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Proposify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.