GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › CPQ › PandaDoc vs QuoteWerks
CPQ · September 2026 Edition

PandaDoc vs QuoteWerks

Zero of twelve models named PandaDoc first on the direct prompt; zero named QuoteWerks. PandaDoc was named by eleven of the twelve models and QuoteWerks by ten and PandaDoc carries 43 labels and QuoteWerks 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

PandaDoc

accepted challenger

South San Francisco, United States, founded 2013. Named in five categories this edition.

QuoteWerks

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share13%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4320A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PandaDoc reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DealHub was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. DealHub vs PandaDoc · DealHub vs QuoteWerks

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PandaDocFirst choices, of twelve modelsQuoteWerks
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against PandaDoc · 1 against QuoteWerks
Budget-constrained64
Scale-constrained002 against PandaDoc · 1 against QuoteWerks
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PandaDoc and QuoteWerks stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Nue, PandaDoc, Salesbricks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: PandaDoc, Salesforce CPQ
Grok 4.1 FastDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashDealHub alternatives: PandaDoc
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Zuora CPQ
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Quotient, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Management / Salesforce CPQ, Tacton
Mistral SmallDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Quotient, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, Qwoty
MiniMax M2.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PandaDoc leads by forty points.
PandaDoc54%#1 of 10
QuoteWerks13%#2 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
PandaDoc leads by four points.
PandaDoc13%#2 of 12
QuoteWerks9%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
PandaDoc0%#– of 9
QuoteWerks0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about PandaDoc

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Skip the lightweight SMB tools (PandaDoc, HubSpot Quotes, QuoteWerks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative

What the models said about QuoteWerks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Skip the lightweight SMB tools (PandaDoc, HubSpot Quotes, QuoteWerks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“Less sophisticated configuration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“For most small businesses: QuoteWerks ($15-30/user/month) offers the best balance of affordability and functionality.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“QuoteWerks is affordable and quick to stand up, making it ideal for SMBs, MSPs, and IT resellers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best CPQ choice is usually QuoteWerks or PandaDoc” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
DealHub vs PandaDocDealHub vs QuoteWerksThe full CPQ standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.