GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › CPQ › DealHub vs QuoteWerks
CPQ · September 2026 Edition

DealHub vs QuoteWerks

Twelve of twelve models named DealHub first on the direct prompt; zero named QuoteWerks. DealHub was named by twelve of the twelve models and QuoteWerks by ten and DealHub carries 46 labels and QuoteWerks 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

DealHub

endorsed leader

Named in six categories this edition.

QuoteWerks

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share62%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4620A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, DealHub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.PandaDoc was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. DealHub vs PandaDoc · PandaDoc vs QuoteWerks

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DealHubFirst choices, of twelve modelsQuoteWerks
Direct120
Paraphrase120
Comparative201 against QuoteWerks
Budget-constrained04
Scale-constrained401 against QuoteWerks
Negative101 against DealHub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where DealHub and QuoteWerks stood in it.

DealHub first, QuoteWerks an alternative

12 of 12 modelsQuoteWerks was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Management / Salesforce CPQ, Tacton
Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Nue, PandaDoc, Salesbricks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: PandaDoc, Salesforce CPQ
Grok 4.1 FastDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Mistral SmallDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Quotient, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, Qwoty
Qwen 3.7 FlashDealHub alternatives: PandaDoc
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Zuora CPQ
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Quotient, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
MiniMax M2.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuoteWerks leads by four points.
QuoteWerks13%#2 of 10
DealHub10%#3 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: DealHub leads at mid-market.
DealHub62%#1 of 12
QuoteWerks9%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
DealHub leads by six points.
DealHub6%#4 of 9
QuoteWerks0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about DealHub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“A massive mid-market favorite. It is zero-code, incredibly fast to implement, natively integrates with Salesforce/HubSpot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for speed of rollout: DealHub because multiple sources highlight quick deployment and no-code setup.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Default pick: DealHub — it's purpose-built for mid-market B2B, has the best reviews, deploys fast” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about QuoteWerks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Skip the lightweight SMB tools (PandaDoc, HubSpot Quotes, QuoteWerks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“Less sophisticated configuration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“For most small businesses: QuoteWerks ($15-30/user/month) offers the best balance of affordability and functionality.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“QuoteWerks is affordable and quick to stand up, making it ideal for SMBs, MSPs, and IT resellers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best CPQ choice is usually QuoteWerks or PandaDoc” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
DealHub vs PandaDocPandaDoc vs QuoteWerksThe full CPQ standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.