QuoteWerks vs Conga CPQ
Zero of fourteen models named QuoteWerks first on the direct prompt; zero named Conga CPQ. QuoteWerks was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Conga CPQ by thirteen and QuoteWerks carries 23 labels and Conga CPQ 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
By framing
QuoteWerksFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConga CPQ
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, QuoteWerks and Conga CPQ were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 88 answers naming QuoteWerks and the 108 naming Conga CPQ. In those answers Conga CPQ took the first choice two times and QuoteWerks two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
QuoteWerks Conga CPQ first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, QuoteWerks on the left and Conga CPQ on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
QuoteWerks14%#2 of 10Conga CPQ3%#6 of 10QuoteWerks9%#3 of 12Conga CPQ4%#4 of 12Conga CPQ4%#3 of 9QuoteWerks2%#– of 9What the models said about QuoteWerks
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid SMB-only like QuoteWerks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · hard negative
“QuoteWerks is the best budget pick in the results: it is described as affordable for small sales teams” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc from ~$19/mo and QuoteWerks from ~$15/mo are the starting points most analysts point to.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuoteWerks because: Lowest entry price ($15/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Conga CPQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some Conga products are described as hard to configure and difficult for teams to troubleshoot without vendor support” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users find the complexity of Conga CPQ challenging, especially during initial setup and learning phases.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“vendors such as Conga use custom pricing, so the subscription price alone won't tell you the total cost” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market standouts: DealHub and Conga CPQ balance power with faster implementation timelines.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend DealHub CPQ or Conga CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Conga CPQ: An enterprise CPQ platform that helps sales teams configure products, manage complex pricing structures” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.