Zero of fourteen models named Conga CPQ first on the direct prompt; zero named HubSpot Commerce Hub. Conga CPQ was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Commerce Hub by eleven and Conga CPQ carries 35 labels and HubSpot Commerce Hub 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Conga CPQ and HubSpot Commerce Hub were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 108 answers naming Conga CPQ and the 75 naming HubSpot Commerce Hub. In those answers HubSpot Commerce Hub took the first choice three times and Conga CPQ zero.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some Conga products are described as hard to configure and difficult for teams to troubleshoot without vendor support” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users find the complexity of Conga CPQ challenging, especially during initial setup and learning phases.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“vendors such as Conga use custom pricing, so the subscription price alone won't tell you the total cost” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market standouts: DealHub and Conga CPQ balance power with faster implementation timelines.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend DealHub CPQ or Conga CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Conga CPQ: An enterprise CPQ platform that helps sales teams configure products, manage complex pricing structures” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“These tools sit on the lighter end of the CPQ spectrum... They will break down if you try to build complex multi-layered product hierarchies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Look instead at modern, agile, and mid-market-focused CPQ tools (like Dealsign, PandaDoc, or HubSpot CPQ)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“if you need basic quoting functionality only, HubSpot's free tier might be sufficient to start” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.