| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 2% | 6 of 66 | 4% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 60 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 6 of 66 |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 76, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“Look instead at modern, agile, and mid-market-focused CPQ tools (like Dealsign, PandaDoc, or HubSpot CPQ)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · alternative
“if you need basic quoting functionality only, HubSpot's free tier might be sufficient to start” MiniMax M2.5 · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative
“HubSpot's free CRM with basic quoting ... can work if you don't need complex configuration rules” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“These tools sit on the lighter end of the CPQ spectrum... They will break down if you try to build complex multi-layered product hierarchies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 75 answers that named HubSpot Commerce Hub and are not a share of its labels.
310 of the 310 domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Commerce Hub came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What HubSpot Commerce Hub's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: blog.hubspot.com/sales/selling-digital-products, developers.hubspot.com/changelog/commerce-hub-apis, blog.hubspot.com/sales/hubspot-commerce-hub-pricing, community.hubspot.com/t/e-commerce/54254, community.hubspot.com/t/e-commerce-store/99390. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Commerce Hub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Commerce Hub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot Commerce Hub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: