Every category where a model named HubSpot Commerce Hub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	4%	4 of 73	8%	25	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HubSpot Commerce Hub yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HubSpot Commerce Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase12 labels2

Comparative16 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels2

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative16 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Bitrix24 or HubSpot free for zero-risk testing” Grok 4.1 Fast · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice

“Best budget-friendly all-in-one option: HubSpot CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice

“HubSpot is strongest for mid-market B2B teams with fixed, seat-based, or tiered pricing... This is ideal if you're already using HubSpot.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative

“consider the native CPQ solution in your CRM, such as HubSpot Revenue Hub, before buying a separate CPQ tool” Llama 4 Maverick · CPQ · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip the lightweight SMB tools (PandaDoc, HubSpot Quotes, QuoteWerks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · scale prompt · hard negative

“Avoid "Free" or Basic CRM Quoting Tools if you have product dependencies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Commerce Hub, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Commerce Hub was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc60 of 6722Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ44 of 673Not in the top three

QuoteWerks39 of 674Not in the top three

DealHub37 of 6713Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ31 of 670Not in the top three

SAP CPQ26 of 670Not in the top three

Conga CPQ17 of 670Not in the top three

Proposify15 of 670Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud11 of 672Not in the top three

Experlogix10 of 670Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Commerce Hub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 67 answers that named HubSpot Commerce Hub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9

gokickflip.com7

monday.com6

pandadoc.com6

g2.com5

salesbricks.com5

zoovu.com5

cincom.com4

qobra.co4

aktivsoftware.com3

Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Commerce Hub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software9

gokickflip.com/blog/best-cpq-software-for-small-business7

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq-software6

g2.com/categories/cpq/small-business5

pandadoc.com/blog/cpq-for-small-business5

salesbricks.com/blog/best-cpq-software-for-small-business5

zoovu.com/blog/best-cpq-software5

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HubSpot Commerce Hub

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot Commerce Hub; a claim can dispute any of them.

HubSpot CPQ 10HubSpot Revenue Hub 7HubSpot Quotes 4HubSpot 3HubSpot Revenue Hub (Commerce Hub) 1

The company

HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Commerce Hub.

Website: hubspot.com
Headquarters: Cambridge, United States
Founded: 2006
Employees: about 8,246 (2024)
Ownership: Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Commerce Hub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Commerce Hub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hubspot.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.