Every category where a model named Oracle CPQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	72 of 73	45%	31	criticized challenger
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	69 of 79	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	73 of 103	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle CPQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	5	6
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	3	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	2	0	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels2

Paraphrase22 labels4

Comparative26 labelsNone

Budget-constrained18 labels3

Scale-constrained13 labelsNone

Negative25 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative123 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle CPQ excels at complex, engineered-to-order products with its robust rules engine” Kimi K2 · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Oracle CPQ or SAP CPQ if you're already deep in those enterprise ecosystems.” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

“better if you are already in the Oracle stack and need enterprise-grade process control” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Large enterprises, complex manufacturing, B2B with intricate product catalogs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consistently draws the sharpest criticism from verified reviewers... The ones to be most cautious with are Oracle CPQ (support/release-cycle pain)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

“Oracle CPQ — *Expensive and high-maintenance* ... Avoid if: You're not already an Oracle ERP/CX shop” Kimi K2 · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

“Risk level: HIGH - Best suited for enterprises with dedicated technical teams, not typical buyers” Mistral Small · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Heavy enterprise engines (like Oracle CPQ) if you don't have dedicated developers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle CPQ, over the 123 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle CPQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP CPQ84 of 1231Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ83 of 12315Not in the top three

DealHub80 of 12318Not in the top three

Conga CPQ67 of 1231Not in the top three

PandaDoc59 of 12315Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud49 of 12323Not in the top three

HubSpot Commerce Hub31 of 12310Not in the top three

Tacton31 of 1231Not in the top three

QuoteWerks29 of 1233Not in the top three

PROS Smart CPQ28 of 1230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle CPQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 123 answers that named Oracle CPQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com12

monday.com11

cincom.com10

qobra.co10

gartner.com8

salesbricks.com8

salesforce.com7

g2.com6

pandadoc.com6

conga.com5

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle CPQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software12

qobra.co/blog/cpq-software10

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools9

gartner.com/reviews/market/configure-price-quote-applications8

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq-software8

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq7

salesbricks.com/blog/best-cpq-software6

cpqconsultant.com/resources/cpq-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle CPQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle CPQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle 3Oracle / SAP CPQ 2

The company

Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle CPQ.

Website: oracle.com
Headquarters: Bengaluru, India
Founded: 1977
Employees: about 162,000 (2025)
Ownership: Public, ORCL on Nasdaq

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle CPQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle CPQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.