Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 60 → 51 of 52
Oracle · 1 category · RankedOracle CPQ
125Judge labels
19First choices
45Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
34% in CPQ for enterprise buyers
Rank 63 of 66 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Oracle CPQ →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business or mid-market.
Small business53 of 54
0%21 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market63 of 66
0%32 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 49
34%63 labels
endorsed leader
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle CPQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 0% | 63 of 66 | 38% | 32 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle CPQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CPQ · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 63 → 60 of 62
Enterprise▲+15Since September 2026: 18% → 33%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
33%from 18% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels5
Paraphrase22 labels8
Comparative26 labelsNone
Budget-constrained16 labels6
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative125 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Offers deep functionality for managing complex product catalogs and global pricing. It is powerful but can be heavier to configure.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Global enterprises with multi-entity pricing... steep learning curve and complex implementation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises, particularly those with complex manufacturing or ERP-heavy environments” MiniMax M2.5 · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative
“A powerhouse for complex configurations... Best For: Large enterprises with complex supply chains” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid enterprise-grade CPQs like Salesforce CPQ, Oracle CPQ Cloud, or DealHub initially” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · hard negative
“Oracle/SAP CPQ: Only if you're already locked into those ERP ecosystems.” Kimi K2 · CPQ · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: ... or Oracle start higher and suit bigger ops.” Grok 4.20 · CPQ · budget prompt · hard negative
“If you're mid-market, avoid.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle CPQ, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle CPQ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle CPQ, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle CPQ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle CPQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 123 of the 125 answers that named Oracle CPQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qobra.co71
conga.com57
guideflow.com56
monday.com55
albato.com51
pandadoc.com39
everstage.com38
g2.com38
salesbricks.com35
dealhub.io33
473 of the 473 domain citations in answers naming Oracle CPQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle CPQ stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle CPQ stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“oracle cpq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 45 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 63 of 66 in CPQ
Segment leader
57%
DealHub
- First choices
- 19 across its categories
- Named in
- 125 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 123 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle CPQ
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle CPQ; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle CPQ Cloud 5Oracle 3Oracle CPQ (formerly BigMachines) 2Oracle CPQ Cloud (formerly BigMachines) 1Oracle/SAP CPQ 1
Follow Oracle CPQ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle CPQ.ShowHide
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle CPQ.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- oracle.com
- Headquarters
- Bengaluru, India
- Founded
- 1977
- Employees
- about 162,000 (2025)
- Ownership
- Public, ORCL on Nasdaq
- Also from Oracle
- Oracle ATG, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Oracle BI, Oracle BlueKai, Oracle CDX, Oracle CRM, Oracle CX and 46 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a cloud-based, globally accessible quoting tool that supports structured pricing and customized proposals
- For
- Professional services
- Free plan or trial
- Request a CPQ Demo oracle.com/cx/sales/cpq
- Customers named
- DNV
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle CPQ's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/customers/dnv-cpq, oracle.com/cx/sales/cpq, oracle.com/apac/customers/dnv-cpq, oracle.com/asean/customers/dnv-cpq, oracle.com/africa/customers/dnv-cpq. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle CPQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle CPQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle CPQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle CPQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle CPQ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.