Every category where a model named Tacton for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	10 of 73	0%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tacton yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tacton across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“These are industry standards for companies that require 2D/3D visual product builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · scale prompt · alternative

“Strong rules-based configuration for manufacturers and highly configurable products.” Perplexity Sonar · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

“Complex manufacturing? PROS, Tacton, or Revalize (higher ratings, fewer complaints)” Grok 4.1 Fast · CPQ · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Tacton if your products are highly configurable and engineering-heavy.” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tacton, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tacton was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP CPQ33 of 360Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ31 of 361Not in the top three

Conga CPQ31 of 360Not in the top three

DealHub30 of 366Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud20 of 3611Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ19 of 368Not in the top three

PROS Smart CPQ16 of 360Not in the top three

PandaDoc15 of 360Not in the top three

Experlogix11 of 360Not in the top three

PROS10 of 360Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tacton. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 36 answers that named Tacton and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com2

cincom.com1

conga.com1

croclub.com1

devopsschool.com1

dock.us1

docs.oracle.com1

financesonline.com1

g2.com1

gitnux.org1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Tacton came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/configure-price-quote-applications2

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools1

conga.com/press/conga-recognized-2026-gartner-magic-quadrant-configure-price-and-quote-app1

conga.com/salesforce1

croclub.com/tools/best-cpq-software1

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-configure-price-quote-cpq-software-features-pros-cons-compari1

dock.us/library/cpq-software1

docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/saas/configure-price-quote1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tacton

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tacton; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tacton CPQ 8Tacton/Infor CPQ 1

The company

Tacton Systems is the company behind Tacton.

Website: tacton.com
Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden
Founded: 1998

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tacton's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tacton, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tacton.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.