Every category where a model named Conga CPQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	9 of 73	18%	34	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conga CPQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conga CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	4	1	0	5
Mistral Small	2	1	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	4	0	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labelsNone

Paraphrase16 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained14 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative96 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Advanced rules, CLM/docs, AI pricing; good for configurable products... Higher TCO (~$350K+ for 50 users)” Grok 4.1 Fast · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong for complex configurations and contracts... Best for enterprises or Salesforce-native teams.” Kimi K2 · CPQ · direct prompt · alternative

“Mid-market sweet spot: DealHub, Conga, and Salesforce CPQ ... are the most commonly evaluated.” Kimi K2 · CPQ · scale prompt · alternative

“Conga differentiates by combining CPQ with contract lifecycle management in one platform” Kimi K2 · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Powerful, but commonly a better fit for larger organizations with CLM needs; setup and ramp-up can be substantial.” Perplexity Sonar · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative

“worth considering, but it tends to require more implementation effort and ongoing administration” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Risk level: MODERATE-HIGH - Powerful but requires significant investment and expertise” Mistral Small · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative

“Approach Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus) with caution if you want a fast, modern UI” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conga CPQ, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conga CPQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DealHub73 of 9623Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ67 of 965Not in the top three

SAP CPQ65 of 960Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ58 of 9618Not in the top three

PandaDoc44 of 962Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud41 of 9618Not in the top three

Tacton31 of 961Not in the top three

PROS Smart CPQ29 of 961Not in the top three

Experlogix23 of 960Not in the top three

QuoteWerks20 of 961Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conga CPQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 96 answers that named Conga CPQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9

monday.com9

cincom.com7

salesforce.com7

gartner.com6

qobra.co6

conga.comYour site5

cpqconsultant.com4

croclub.com4

dealhub.io4

Fifty-six of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Conga CPQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software8

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools6

qobra.co/blog/cpq-software6

gartner.com/reviews/market/configure-price-quote-applications5

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq5

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq-software5

salesforce.com/sales/cpq5

cpqconsultant.com/resources/cpq-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Conga CPQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Conga CPQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus) 3Conga 2Conga CPQ (Apttus CPQ) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga CPQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga CPQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conga.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.