AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Conga CPQ · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Conga CPQ

108Judge labels
7First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in CPQ for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 35 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Conga CPQ →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Conga CPQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
CPQRevenue operations4%5 of 6623%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Conga CPQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CPQ · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 58 → 8 of 52
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 41

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CPQ0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 5 of 66

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Conga CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini12014
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.2003104
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash03115
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K203003
GLM 4.7 FlashX01113
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01012
Muse Glimmer 30B10113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels1
Paraphrase20 labels4
Comparative30 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels2
Negative16 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative108 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-market standouts: DealHub and Conga CPQ balance power with faster implementation timelines.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CPQ · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend DealHub CPQ or Conga CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Conga CPQ: An enterprise CPQ platform that helps sales teams configure products, manage complex pricing structures” Llama 4 Maverick · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative
“Unbeatable for bridging CPQ with legal CLM and margins. However, it can be heavy to configure and maintain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CPQ · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“some Conga products are described as hard to configure and difficult for teams to troubleshoot without vendor support” GPT-5.4 mini · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users find the complexity of Conga CPQ challenging, especially during initial setup and learning phases.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CPQ · negative prompt · soft negative
“vendors such as Conga use custom pricing, so the subscription price alone won't tell you the total cost” GPT-6 Luna · CPQ · budget prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise-focused ($500M+ revenue), handles high-volume quoting and complex pricing agreements.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CPQ · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conga CPQ, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conga CPQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Oracle CPQ77 of 1089Not among the top eight
SAP CPQ49 of 1080Not among the top eight
PROS Smart CPQ25 of 1080Not among the top eight
Tacton23 of 1083Not among the top eight
Experlogix18 of 1080Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conga CPQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 108 of the 108 answers that named Conga CPQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qobra.co58
conga.comYour site57
guideflow.com55
monday.com52
albato.com51
g2.com37
dealhub.io34
everstage.com34
pandadoc.com31
salesbricks.com28

380 of the 437 domain citations in answers naming Conga CPQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

conga.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Conga CPQ takes 4% of first choices and DealHub takes 57%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cpq software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best cpq software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“conga cpq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
19 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 46,363 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,418 · 311 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,867
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $224 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 97 text, 18 video, 5 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2022, as AppExtremes LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 67 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 66 in CPQ
Segment leader
57%
DealHub
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
108 answers
Its own site cited
in 108 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on conga.com
3,830
subdomains included
Content
819
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,278
Product · Integration
52 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog47342026-09-18
Case study14522026-09-09
News or press7632026-08-12
Webinar or virtual event5622026-07-22
Conference or event2402025-09-17
Report or ebook2212026-08-03
Comparison1232026-09-08
Glossary or explainer1002026-04-15
Template or tool112026-08-21

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on conga.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page conga.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Conga CPQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Conga CPQ; a claim can dispute any of them.
Conga 9Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus) 1

Follow Conga CPQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Conga CPQ is its own company.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga CPQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga CPQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conga CPQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Conga CPQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conga CPQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conga.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.