Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 88 → 85 of 92
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not rankedOracle Autonomous Data Warehouse
4Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse was named 2 times in Warehouse & ETL, where Hightouch led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business92 of 99
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market79 of 83
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise73 of 82
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In warehouse & etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 79 of 83 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Warehouse & ETL · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 80 → 77 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 → 69 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warehouse & ETL | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 79 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“On-prem / legacy data warehouses (e.g., older Oracle VMs, Teradata without cloud migration) | High maintenance burden, slow scaling” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative
“Legacy On-Premises or Enterprise Systems (e.g., Teradata, Oracle, traditional SQL Server)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cdp.com4
funnel.io3
aboutmartech.com2
dataslayer.ai2
etlclub.net2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
icypeas.com2
improvado.io2
integrate.io2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle 2
Follow Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse.ShowHide
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- oracle.com
- Headquarters
- Bengaluru, India
- Founded
- 1977
- Employees
- about 162,000 (2025)
- Ownership
- Public, ORCL on Nasdaq
- Also from Oracle
- Oracle ATG, Oracle Analytics, Oracle BI, Oracle BlueKai, Oracle CDX, Oracle CPQ, Oracle CRM, Oracle CX and 46 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Develop scalable AI-powered apps with any data using built-in AI capabilities. Use your choice of large language model and deploy in any cloud or your data center.
- For
- developers
- Price stated
- Get started at the lowest cost; you only pay for what you use. oracle.com/apac/autonomous-database
- Free plan or trial
- Oracle Cloud offers a Free Tier with a 30-day free trial and always-free services. oracle.com/autonomous-database
- Integrations claimed
- 100 oracle.com/autonomous-database
- Certifications
- FedRAMP HighHIPAAPCI DSSSOC 1SOC 2
- Hosting
- OCIAWSAzureGoogle CloudExadata Cloud@CustomerOracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)Microsoft AzureOracle Cloud
- Customers named
- Oracle Fusion ApplicationsNetSuiteE-Business SuitePeopleSoftJD EdwardsSiebel
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price
What Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oracle.com/autonomous-database, oracle.com/apac/autonomous-database, oracle.com/asean/autonomous-database, oracle.com/latam/autonomous-database, oracle.com/africa/autonomous-database. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.