AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Revenue operations › CPQ › HubSpot Commerce Hub vs Proposify
CPQ · October 2026 Edition

HubSpot Commerce Hub vs Proposify

Zero of fourteen models named HubSpot Commerce Hub first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. HubSpot Commerce Hub was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Proposify by eight and HubSpot Commerce Hub carries 25 labels and Proposify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HubSpot Commerce Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in two categories this edition.

Proposify

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2512A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HubSpot Commerce Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DealHub was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. DealHub vs HubSpot Commerce Hub · DealHub vs Proposify · PandaDoc vs HubSpot Commerce Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HubSpot Commerce HubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProposify
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against HubSpot Commerce Hub · 1 against Proposify
Budget-constrained11
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HubSpot Commerce Hub and Proposify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
HubSpot Commerce Hub Proposify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Commerce Hub on the left and Proposify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HubSpot Commerce Hub and Proposify stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, NetSuite CPQ, Nue, PandaDoc
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: BetterCommerce, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, PandaDoc
Mistral SmallDealHub
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Zuora CPQ
Qwen 3.7 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Combeenation, Experlogix
MiniMax M2.5DealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
GPT-6 LunaDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Muse Glimmer 30BDealHub alternatives: Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HubSpot Commerce Hub leads by ten points.
HubSpot Commerce Hub14%#3 of 10
Proposify3%#5 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
HubSpot Commerce Hub2%#5 of 12
Proposify2%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
HubSpot Commerce Hub0%#– of 9
Proposify0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HubSpot Commerce Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“These tools sit on the lighter end of the CPQ spectrum... They will break down if you try to build complex multi-layered product hierarchies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Look instead at modern, agile, and mid-market-focused CPQ tools (like Dealsign, PandaDoc, or HubSpot CPQ)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“if you need basic quoting functionality only, HubSpot's free tier might be sufficient to start” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Proposify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.