Conga CPQ vs Proposify
Zero of fourteen models named Conga CPQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. Conga CPQ was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Proposify by eight and Conga CPQ carries 35 labels and Proposify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
By framing
Conga CPQFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProposify
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Conga CPQ Proposify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Conga CPQ on the left and Proposify on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Conga CPQ3%#6 of 10Proposify3%#5 of 10What the models said about Conga CPQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“some Conga products are described as hard to configure and difficult for teams to troubleshoot without vendor support” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users find the complexity of Conga CPQ challenging, especially during initial setup and learning phases.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“vendors such as Conga use custom pricing, so the subscription price alone won't tell you the total cost” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market standouts: DealHub and Conga CPQ balance power with faster implementation timelines.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend DealHub CPQ or Conga CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Conga CPQ: An enterprise CPQ platform that helps sales teams configure products, manage complex pricing structures” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about Proposify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“PandaDoc, Proposify, or HubSpot Quotes are the best starting points” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.