GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Zoho CPQ · September 2026 Edition

Zoho · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Zoho CPQ

4Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zoho CPQ was named 2 times in CPQ, where DealHub led with 62%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 71

under the label threshold

Mid-market71 of 73

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho CPQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	71 of 73	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho CPQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho CPQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise CPQs (like Salesforce CPQ, Klipfolio, or Zoho CPQ Premium)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · hard negative

“Less advanced configuration capabilities” Kimi K2 · CPQ · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho CPQ, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho CPQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc4 of 42Not in the top three

HubSpot Commerce Hub4 of 41Not in the top three

DealHub3 of 42Not in the top three

Oracle CPQ3 of 40Not in the top three

Salesforce CPQ3 of 40Not in the top three

Conga CPQ2 of 40Not in the top three

QuoteWerks2 of 40Not in the top three

SAP CPQ2 of 40Not in the top three

Zuora CPQ2 of 40Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Cloud1 of 41Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Zoho CPQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zoho CPQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zoho CPQ Premium 1

The company

Zoho Office Suite is the company behind Zoho CPQ.

Website: zoho.com
Headquarters: India, India
Founded: 1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho CPQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho CPQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.