AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Zoho Bookings · October 2026 Edition
Zoho · 1 category · Ranked

Zoho Bookings

21Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Zoho Bookings →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho Bookings for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Meeting schedulingSales0%16 of 589%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Zoho Bookings held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Scheduling · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 13 of 50
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 14 of 55
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 of 58, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Scheduling0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 37 → 16 of 58

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zoho Bookings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000202
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Free tier available, good for small teams and integrates with Zoho CRM.” Mistral Small · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
“For budget-conscious teams, Zoho Bookings is worth considering.” Mistral Small · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Zoho Bookings – The Ecosystem Integrator” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already a Zoho shop → Zoho Bookings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steep learning curve with confusing setup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Bookings, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Bookings was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Calendly21 of 2115Not among the top eight
Cal.com14 of 212Not among the top eight
HubSpot Meetings11 of 213Not among the top eight
Microsoft Bookings11 of 210Not among the top eight
Acuity Scheduling8 of 210Not among the top eight
Doodle7 of 210Not among the top eight
Chili Piper6 of 210Not among the top eight
YouCanBookMe6 of 210Not among the top eight
SavvyCal5 of 210Not among the top eight
Setmore5 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Bookings. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named Zoho Bookings and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

calendly.com15
cal.com12
revenuehero.io12
zoho.comYour site11
blog.hubspot.com10
kumospace.com9
koalendar.com8
g2.com7
zapier.com7
agiled.app5

Eighty-five of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Zoho Bookings came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Zoho Bookings stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“zoho bookings”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
268 a month
Its own site
It sits on Zoho's site (zoho.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 58 in scheduling
Segment leader
36%
Calendly
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Zoho Bookings

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zoho is the company behind Zoho Bookings.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
free online AI-powered appointment scheduling software
For
businesses of all sizes
Price stated
user-based pricing zoho.com/bookings
Starting price
0 zoho.com/bookings
Free plan or trial
15-day trial period zoho.com/bookings
Integrations claimed
75 zoho.com/bookings · 16 zoho.com.cn/bookings pages disagree
Hosting
USUS data centerUSデータセンター
Customers named
ZillowMaximusiStoreAmerican Health ConnectionRockley Family FoundationJeremiah Hartmann Live Event Hosts & MCsSpaghetti AgencyArtifex Marketing Studio
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What Zoho Bookings's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/bookings, zoho.com.cn/bookings, zoho.com/fr/bookings, zoho.com/de/bookings, zoho.com/jp/bookings. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Bookings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Bookings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Bookings by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zoho Bookings is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zoho Bookings, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.