Every category where a model named Zoho Bookings for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	42 of 77	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Bookings yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Bookings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for businesses already using Zoho\u2019s suite of tools” MiniMax M2.5 · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users frequently cite significant reliability and usability gaps compared to competitors.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Bookings, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Bookings was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly14 of 148Not in the top three

Cal.com7 of 141Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling7 of 140Not in the top three

Setmore6 of 140Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings5 of 141Not in the top three

Doodle5 of 140Not in the top three

SavvyCal5 of 140Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe4 of 140Not in the top three

TidyCal3 of 141Not in the top three

Chili Piper3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Bookings. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 14 answers that named Zoho Bookings and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

calendly.com2

ustechautomations.com2

albato.com1

b2breviews.com1

barakahsoft.com1

bigcontacts.com1

blog.supersaas.com1

educba.com1

emailtooltester.com1

goodcall.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Zoho Bookings came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/best-scheduling-software-small-business-20262

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline1

b2breviews.com/appointment-scheduling-software1

barakahsoft.com/best-appointment-scheduling-software-smbs-20261

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools1

blog.supersaas.com/best_booking_apps_small_business1

calendly.com/blog/meeting-scheduling-software1

calendly.com/solutions/small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Zoho Office Suite is the company behind Zoho Bookings.

Website: zoho.com
Headquarters: India, India
Founded: 1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Bookings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Bookings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.