Every category where a model named Calendly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	59%	1 of 77	13%	60	endorsed leader
AI SDR agents	Sales	2%	19 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	25 of 104	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%
Customer success platforms	Customer	0%	43 of 69	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Calendly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Calendly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	5	0	0	1	6
GPT-5.4 mini	3	1	0	0	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	3	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	3	1	0	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	4	0	0	1	5
Mistral Small	3	1	0	1	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	5	0	0	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	3	0	1	7
Kimi K2	4	2	0	1	7
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	1	1	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	4	0	1	1	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct35 labels23

Paraphrase36 labels31

Comparative39 labels28not counted in share

Budget-constrained39 labels21

Scale-constrained26 labels11

Negative34 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative209 labels in all, every segment counted; 86 of the 116 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“prioritize routing depth (Chili Piper, RevenueHero, Calendly Enterprise)... Calendly Teams or SavvyCal may suffice at a fraction of the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · scale prompt · first choice

“The best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams on a limited budget is Calendly, as it is simple, cheap, and universally trusted.” Llama 4 Maverick · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice

“My recommendation: Start with Calendly for its proven track record, extensive integrations, and predictable pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Use Calendly if you want the most familiar all-purpose booking tool for meetings with clients, prospects, or teammates.” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Calendly (Medium-High Concern) ... Extensive data sharing ... Not HIPAA compliant” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

“its limitations appear when routing requires deeper account matching, territory rules, capacity management, or advanced Salesforce logic” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · budget prompt · soft negative

“While widely used, it consistently faces criticism for being overly complex for simple tasks and creating friction in sales.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

“Calendly (most popular, but flagged often) ... Not HIPAA-ready on free/Standard/Teams plans ... Avoid for healthcare.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Calendly, over the 209 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Calendly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chili Piper118 of 20911Compare →

Cal.com99 of 20915Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings98 of 2098Compare →

Doodle46 of 2090Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings45 of 2095Not in the top three

SavvyCal45 of 2090Not in the top three

RevenueHero42 of 2098Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling38 of 2090Not in the top three

Setmore28 of 2091Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe24 of 2090Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Calendly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 209 answers that named Calendly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

calendly.comYour site18

guideflow.com14

youcanbook.me14

blog.hubspot.com13

cal.com12

albato.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

cleverly.co9

leadangel.com9

marketbetter.ai9

102 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming Calendly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software11

marketbetter.ai/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software-sales-teams-20269

blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools8

cleverly.co/blog/appointment-scheduling-software8

guideflow.com/blog/online-appointment-scheduling-software-tools8

revenuehero.io/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software8

youcanbook.me/blog/best-scheduling-apps8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Calendly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Calendly; a claim can dispute any of them.

Calendly Teams 3Calendly (Teams/Enterprise) 2Calendly (Enterprise) 1Calendly (Teams Plan) 1Calendly/YouCanBookMe 1

The company

Calendly.

Website: calendly.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calendly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calendly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at calendly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.