Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 103
2 categories · RankedRevenueHero
68Judge labels
6First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Lead routing for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of RevenueHero →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 110
2%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 111
4%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise24 of 87
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RevenueHero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 4% | 7 of 111 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 3% | 6 of 58 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RevenueHero held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 7 of 103
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 24 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 7 of 111 |
| Scheduling | 4% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RevenueHero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RevenueHero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels5
Paraphrase9 labelsNone
Comparative13 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, RevenueHero offers the best balance of advanced routing features, CRM integration, and fair pricing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, RevenueHero offers the best balance of features, speed, and affordability.” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“RevenueHero for a HubSpot-led team mainly trying to improve inbound routing and booking” GPT-6 Luna · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“🏆 Best Overall: RevenueHero” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RevenueHero, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RevenueHero was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RevenueHero, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RevenueHero was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RevenueHero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 67 of the 68 answers that named RevenueHero and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com32
revenuehero.ioYour site31
marketbetter.ai24
default.com23
leadangel.com23
guideflow.com21
calendly.com20
leandata.com20
pipeline.zoominfo.com19
prospeo.io18
200 of the 231 domain citations in answers naming RevenueHero came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
revenuehero.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RevenueHero takes 4% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
revenuehero.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RevenueHero takes 4% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“revenuehero”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,187 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 382 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 681
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 67 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on revenuehero.io
665
subdomains included
Content
350
counted in the table below
Documentation
117
Product · Integration
14 · 45
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 236 | 31 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 47 | 2 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | 4 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 0 | 2025-02-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2024-06-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Ai for lead routing what actually works in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-25Ai lead qualification workflows blog
- 2026-09-23Building a demo funnel dashboard in salesforce blog
- 2026-09-21Building a demo funnel dashboard in hubspot blog
- 2026-09-18Demo funnel metrics every revops team should track in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-16Demo form abandonment benchmarks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page revenuehero.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow RevenueHero
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RevenueHero is its own company.ShowHide
The company
RevenueHero is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Lead routing and scheduling software that books every meeting with the right rep, on rules you set, and can tell you why it went there. Routing, scheduling, and the record behind both.
- For
- 500+ B2B companies
- Price stated
- RevenueHero's pricing plans start at $20 per license per month. revenuehero.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 20 revenuehero.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- We offer a commitment-free trial period of 14 days. revenuehero.io/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 8 revenuehero.io/features/relays
- Certifications
- Okta SSO
- Customers named
- FreshworksSeamlessmatterEverstagePalmettoViviancove.toolArchy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What RevenueHero's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: revenuehero.io, revenuehero.io/pricing, revenuehero.io/features/relays, revenuehero.io/customers, revenuehero.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RevenueHero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RevenueHero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RevenueHero by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RevenueHero is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RevenueHero, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.