Every category where a model named RevenueHero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	4%	6 of 77	0%	12	accepted challenger
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	16 of 104	8%	24	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RevenueHero yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RevenueHero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	5	0	0	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	7	0	1	8
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	3	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	3	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels6

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative19 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained17 labels2

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with RevenueHero if inbound lead conversion is a priority, or Calendly Teams if you want proven reliability at lower cost.” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The Best All-Around Choice for Mid-Market: RevenueHero” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · direct prompt · first choice

“pass the actual distribution to a dedicated routing or scheduling layer (like *Chili Piper, RevenueHero,* or *Default*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · alternative

“Focuses on reducing "fake" demos and ensuring follow-up lands on real human inboxes. Good for outbound-heavy motions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“start around $25–$50/user/month with platform fees — too costly for limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · soft negative

“RevenueHero ⚠️ Minor Caution - Growing Pains” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RevenueHero, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RevenueHero was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chili Piper86 of 9012Not in the top three

Calendly42 of 9023Not in the top three

LeanData42 of 9013Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub34 of 9012Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings29 of 904Not in the top three

LeadAngel28 of 907Not in the top three

Default28 of 903Not in the top three

Kubaru21 of 903Not in the top three

Cal.com20 of 902Not in the top three

Pipedrive15 of 903Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RevenueHero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 90 answers that named RevenueHero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cal.com5

cleverly.co5

default.com4

marketbetter.ai4

zeeg.me4

albato.com3

blog.hubspot.com3

guideflow.com3

leadangel.com3

leandata.com3

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming RevenueHero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline3

cal.com/blog/lead-routing-software3

cleverly.co/blog/appointment-scheduling-software3

revenuehero.io/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software3

youcanbook.me/blog/best-scheduling-apps3

articsledge.com/post/lead-routing-software2

blog.hubspot.com/sales/ai-meeting-scheduling-tools2

blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as RevenueHero

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RevenueHero; a claim can dispute any of them.

Prospeo / RevenueHero 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RevenueHero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RevenueHero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at revenuehero.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.