| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 14% | 2 of 77 | 7% | 44 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HubSpot Meeting Scheduler (free with HubSpot's free CRM) is the best option for sales teams on a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're a HubSpot shop, standardize on HubSpot Meetings and stop — it's free, native, and does the job.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is HubSpot Meetings if your sales team already uses HubSpot” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually HubSpot Sales Hub / HubSpot Meeting Scheduler” GPT-5.4 mini · Scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid HubSpot Meetings for non-business, non-sales meetings where GDPR/CCPA consent is a factor.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid HubSpot Meetings entirely” Mistral Small · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like HubSpot (CRM-heavy) or Zoho (sync issues) frustrate small users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 105 answers that named HubSpot Meetings and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Meetings came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Meetings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Meetings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hubspot.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.