Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 17% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 50, unchanged
HubSpot · 1 category · RankedHubSpot Meetings
118Judge labels
20First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of HubSpot Meetings →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 51
17%43 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 58
17%48 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 64
0%27 labels
accepted challenger
In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HubSpot Meetings for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 17% | 3 of 58 | 6% | 48 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 14% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HubSpot Meetings held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Scheduling · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 14% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 55
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | 14% | 16% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 14% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Meetings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Meetings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct29 labels4
Paraphrase19 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained30 labels14
Scale-constrained17 labels2
Negative11 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative118 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start with HubSpot Meetings (if willing to use HubSpot CRM) or Calendly's free tier” MiniMax M2.5 · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“For most sales teams on a tight budget, HubSpot Meeting Scheduler is the clear winner.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Meetings stands out as the top choice—it's completely free with HubSpot's CRM” Grok 4.20 · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“prioritize Chili Piper or HubSpot Meetings if you need sophisticated routing” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"### 7. HubSpot Meetings ❌ Worst 0/5 for non-sales use."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reasons to be cautious: Limited customer support, a limited free version, syncing issues, occasional glitches, and it can be expensive” Mistral Small · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limitation: It lacks the advanced intelligent routing... this can become a bottleneck as lead volumes grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Meetings, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Meetings was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Meetings, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Meetings was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Meetings. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 109 of the 117 answers that named HubSpot Meetings and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.comYour site74
calendly.com62
albato.com53
revenuehero.io48
cal.com43
pipeline.zoominfo.com32
guideflow.com31
zoho.com31
koalendar.com29
learn.g2.com26
355 of the 429 domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Meetings came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Meetings stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Meetings stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“hubspot meetings”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 62 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on HubSpot's site (hubspot.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
17%
rank 3 of 58 in scheduling
Segment leader
36%
Calendly
- First choices
- 20 across its categories
- Named in
- 117 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 109 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as HubSpot Meetings
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot Meetings; a claim can dispute any of them.
HubSpot Meeting Scheduler 11HubSpot 4HubSpot's Meeting Scheduler 2HubSpot Free Meeting Scheduler 1HubSpot Meetings / Sales Hub 1HubSpot"s meeting scheduler 1
Follow HubSpot Meetings
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Meetings.ShowHide
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Meetings.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- hubspot.com
- Headquarters
- Cambridge, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Employees
- about 8,246 (2024)
- Ownership
- Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange
- Also from HubSpot
- HubSpot, HubSpot ABM, HubSpot AEO Grader, HubSpot AI, HubSpot Academy, HubSpot Ad Management, HubSpot Ads, HubSpot Ads Management and 77 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Schedule meetings faster and forget the back-and-forth emails.
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- Free academy.hubspot.com/streamlining-your-outreach-with-meetings
- Starting price
- Free blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started for Free blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What HubSpot Meetings's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: academy.hubspot.com/streamlining-your-outreach-with-meetings, blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting, blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-meeting-agenda, blog.hubspot.com/sales/ai-meeting-scheduling-tools, blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Meetings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Meetings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot Meetings by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HubSpot Meetings is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HubSpot Meetings, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where HubSpot Meetings is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where HubSpot Meetings is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideHubSpot Meetings is among the products AI models recommend first in Meeting scheduling this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.