Every category where a model named Doodle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	14 of 77	30%	20	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Doodle yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Doodle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative22 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use Doodle if your main problem is *finding a mutually available time* for a group.” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“For group coordination: Doodle — best for polling multiple people across teams.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Pick Doodle if your main problem is finding a time for a group.” GPT-5.4 mini · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“It is the superior choice when you need to schedule a group meeting” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High Caution — Privacy & Security Concerns ... one of the most concerning tools from a privacy standpoint” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

“High Concern: Tools with Significant Privacy Issues ... Doodle uses numerous US-based sub-processors” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Doodle's free tier if you need to project a professional image to external clients.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

“Noted for tracking/analytics features that could be privacy concerns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Doodle, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Doodle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly46 of 4923Not in the top three

Cal.com31 of 498Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings22 of 491Not in the top three

SavvyCal21 of 490Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling18 of 490Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings17 of 491Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe14 of 490Not in the top three

WhenAvailable9 of 494Not in the top three

Reclaim.ai9 of 491Not in the top three

Google Calendar9 of 490Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Doodle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 49 answers that named Doodle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

calendly.com7

youcanbook.me5

cal.com4

doodle.comYour site4

zapier.com4

bigcontacts.com3

guideflow.com3

koalendar.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

ronspotflexwork.com3

Thirty-five of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Doodle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduler-apps4

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools3

calendly.com/solutions/small-business3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software3

ronspotflexwork.com/blog/business-scheduling-tools3

salesforce.com/blog/small-business/best-scheduling-software3

youcanbook.me/blog/best-scheduling-apps3

calendly.com/2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Doodle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Doodle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at doodle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.