| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 2% | 8 of 58 | 29% | 14 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 8 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling — Best Free Option” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“If you already live in Google or Microsoft 365: try Google Calendar appointment schedules or Microsoft Bookings first.” GPT-6 Luna · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling if you mainly need basic booking and live in Google Workspace.” GPT-5.4 mini · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“Native calendar scheduling (Google Calendar, Outlook) is often sufficient and safer for small teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Google Calendar/HubSpot free tools can work, but they are generally less sales-focused” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · budget prompt · soft negative
“(Low cost, but lack the sophisticated sales qualification features mentioned above)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · scale prompt · soft negative
“Google Calendar can be hard to coordinate with multiple people” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“problematic for confidential meetings or legal requirements” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 35 answers that named Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling and are not a share of its labels.
106 of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workspace.google.com/whatsnew/calendar, workspace.google.com/products/calendar, workspace.google.com/resources/appointment-scheduling, workspace.google.com/intl/ar/resources/appointment-scheduling, workspace.google.com/intl/cs/resources/appointment-scheduling. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Calendar Appointment Scheduling by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: