Every category where a model named YouCanBookMe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	9 of 77	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%
Customer success platforms	Customer	0%	54 of 69	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for YouCanBookMe yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated YouCanBookMe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use YouCanBookMe if you need *more control over booking-page rules and customization*.” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“If budget is a primary concern: YouCanBook.me offers the best value for basic needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“known for its incredible depth of branding customization and global accessibility” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Solo reps or simple 1:1 discovery calls. Paid from ~$7-10/month.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as YouCanBookMe, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and YouCanBookMe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly24 of 2517Not in the top three

Doodle14 of 250Not in the top three

Cal.com13 of 253Not in the top three

SavvyCal13 of 250Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings10 of 252Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling8 of 250Not in the top three

Setmore8 of 250Not in the top three

Google Calendar6 of 250Not in the top three

Chili Piper5 of 250Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings5 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named YouCanBookMe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 25 answers that named YouCanBookMe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

calendly.com4

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

youcanbook.meYour site4

doodle.com3

zencal.io3

bigcontacts.com2

guideflow.com2

koalendar.com2

meetergo.com2

meetingnotes.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming YouCanBookMe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software4

zencal.io/blog-posts/meeting-scheduler-software3

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools2

calendly.com/solutions/small-business2

doodle.com/en2

guideflow.com/blog/online-appointment-scheduling-software-tools2

koalendar.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software2

meetergo.com/en/magazine/meeting-scheduling-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as YouCanBookMe

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as YouCanBookMe; a claim can dispute any of them.

YouCanBook.me 3Calendly/YouCanBookMe 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when YouCanBookMe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as YouCanBookMe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at youcanbook.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.