Every category where a model named SavvyCal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	7 of 77	5%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SavvyCal yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SavvyCal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative19 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you prioritize prospect experience: SavvyCal provides the best user interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“Tight budget but need solid core features | SavvyCal or Cal.com” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“Ideal for personalized scheduling with calendar overlays and polling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Calendly Teams or SavvyCal may suffice at a fraction of the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid SavvyCal for budget-conscious teams since it has no free tier” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SavvyCal, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SavvyCal was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly45 of 4533Not in the top three

Cal.com39 of 456Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings23 of 452Not in the top three

Chili Piper22 of 452Not in the top three

Doodle21 of 450Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe13 of 451Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling12 of 450Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings12 of 450Not in the top three

Reclaim.ai9 of 451Not in the top three

RevenueHero7 of 452Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SavvyCal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 45 answers that named SavvyCal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cal.com3

calendly.com3

guideflow.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

manyreach.com2

marketbetter.ai2

serviceform.com2

albato.com1

augmentcode.com1

bigcontacts.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming SavvyCal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software3

guideflow.com/blog/business-scheduling-software-tools2

manyreach.com/blog/meeting-scheduling-tools2

marketbetter.ai/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software-sales-teams-20262

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline1

augmentcode.com/tools/ai-coding-tools-soc2-compliance-enterprise-security-guide1

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SavvyCal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SavvyCal; a claim can dispute any of them.

Savvycal 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SavvyCal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SavvyCal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at savvycal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.