Every category where a model named Acuity Scheduling for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	10 of 77	21%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Acuity Scheduling yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Acuity Scheduling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase13 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For service businesses: Acuity Scheduling — built for appointments, packages, and payments.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“*Yes:* Consider Acuity or check if Calendly Plus meets your specific payment needs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Great for client-facing services with payments/intake forms... Less sales-focused” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“you must use HIPAA-compliant versions of tools like *Acuity Scheduling*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“often criticized for its steep learning curve relative to its actual value” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

“Built for solo pros (e.g., coaches); weak multi-user/team features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

“Poor customer service — multiple reports of unresolved issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Acuity Scheduling, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acuity Scheduling was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly38 of 3827Not in the top three

Cal.com24 of 386Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings18 of 381Not in the top three

Doodle18 of 380Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings14 of 380Not in the top three

Chili Piper12 of 380Not in the top three

SavvyCal12 of 380Not in the top three

Setmore9 of 380Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe8 of 380Not in the top three

Zoho Bookings7 of 380Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acuity Scheduling. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 38 answers that named Acuity Scheduling and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

albato.com1

b2breviews.com1

barakahsoft.com1

blog.supersaas.com1

calendly.com1

emailtooltester.com1

goodcall.com1

jotform.com1

learn.g2.com1

lunacal.ai1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Acuity Scheduling came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline1

b2breviews.com/appointment-scheduling-software1

barakahsoft.com/best-appointment-scheduling-software-smbs-20261

blog.supersaas.com/best_booking_apps_small_business1

calendly.com/solutions/small-business1

emailtooltester.com/en/blog/best-scheduling-app1

goodcall.com/appointment-scheduling-software/small-business1

jotform.com/blog/best-scheduling-app-for-small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Acuity Scheduling

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acuity Scheduling; a claim can dispute any of them.

Acuity Scheduling (by Squarespace) 2Acuity Scheduling (Squarespace) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acuity Scheduling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acuity Scheduling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at acuityscheduling.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.