Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 9 of 50
1 category · RankedAcuity Scheduling
59Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Acuity Scheduling →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 51
0%25 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 58
0%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise51 of 64
0%14 labels
criticized challenger
In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Acuity Scheduling for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 0% | 12 of 58 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Acuity Scheduling held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 44 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Acuity Scheduling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Acuity Scheduling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase21 labelsNone
Comparative16 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Service-led / professional services B2B needing payments, intake forms and client management: Acuity Scheduling Starter $20/mo” Muse Glimmer 30B · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“the best appointment scheduling software for a mid-sized B2B company would be Calendly, Acuity, or Square Appointments” Llama 4 Maverick · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Business that charges for appointments → Acuity (payments, packages, intake forms built in)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“Need more control over booking rules and payments: Acuity Scheduling ($16/month base)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“lower-tier plans of popular tools like Calendly or Acuity are not HIPAA-compliant by default” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acuity Scheduling, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acuity Scheduling was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acuity Scheduling, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acuity Scheduling was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acuity Scheduling. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 59 answers that named Acuity Scheduling and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
calendly.com35
albato.com20
cal.com20
revenuehero.io17
zapier.com16
guideflow.com15
blog.hubspot.com14
capterra.com14
kumospace.com14
agiled.app12
177 of the 177 domain citations in answers naming Acuity Scheduling came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acuityscheduling.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Acuity Scheduling takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
acuityscheduling.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Acuity Scheduling takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “meeting scheduling tool for sales teams”
1
Position for “best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“acuity scheduling”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 288 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 926,226 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 195,031 · 6,191 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 77,125
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 58 in scheduling
Segment leader
36%
Calendly
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 59 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 53 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on acuityscheduling.com
752
subdomains included
Content
342
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
180 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 250 | 8 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 56 | 0 | 2026-02-20 | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 10 | 2 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2024-10-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Boutique fitness industry statistics glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-23Boutique fitness industry statistics glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-14Introducing the booking assistant report or ebook
- 2026-09-14Introducing the booking assistant report or ebook
- 2026-08-12Pilates obsessed cities glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-12Pilates obsessed cities glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page acuityscheduling.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Acuity Scheduling
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acuity Scheduling; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acuity 5Acuity Scheduling (by Squarespace) 1
Follow Acuity Scheduling
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acuity Scheduling is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Acuity Scheduling is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Manage your schedule and get paid with Acuity’s mobile app
- For
- businesses, whether you are a solo entrepreneur, a multi-location business, or managing schedules across your staff
- Price stated
- Download the Acuity Scheduling mobile app for free today. acuityscheduling.com/features/mobile-app
- Starting price
- 16 acuityscheduling.com/compare/acuity-vs-vagaro
- Free plan or trial
- free trial period acuityscheduling.com/features/mobile-app
- Customers named
- A Little GellyVital Massage & BodyworkA.M. Guest HouseHomemade SocialR Accounting GroupPermaestheticsBig Apple BallroomCARLINCUTS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Acuity Scheduling's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: acuityscheduling.com/features/mobile-app, acuityscheduling.com/features/online-booking, acuityscheduling.com/compare/acuity-vs-vagaro, acuityscheduling.com/features/how-acuity-works, acuityscheduling.com/features/class-scheduling. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acuity Scheduling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acuity Scheduling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acuity Scheduling by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acuity Scheduling is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acuity Scheduling, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.