Every category where a model named Setmore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	11 of 77	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Setmore yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Setmore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“highlighted as a budget-friendly free/low-cost choice for small teams, though it is less sales-specialized” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

“Setmore offers the best free standalone option for very small teams (up to 4 users)” Mistral Small · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

“For budget-conscious teams, Setmore delivers excellent value.” Mistral Small · Scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Strong free alternatives if it doesn't fit” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Setmore, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Setmore was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly28 of 2919Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings22 of 298Not in the top three

Cal.com16 of 291Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling9 of 290Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe8 of 290Not in the top three

Doodle7 of 290Not in the top three

OnceHub6 of 290Not in the top three

SavvyCal6 of 290Not in the top three

Zoho Bookings6 of 290Not in the top three

Chili Piper5 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Setmore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 29 answers that named Setmore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

youcanbook.me4

blog.hubspot.com3

koalendar.com3

marketbetter.ai3

zencal.io3

albato.com2

bigcontacts.com2

calendly.com2

cleverly.co2

learn.g2.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Setmore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.hubspot.com/sales/free-scheduling-software-sales-teams3

koalendar.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software3

marketbetter.ai/blog/best-meeting-scheduling-software-sales-teams-20263

youcanbook.me/blog/best-meeting-schedulers3

zencal.io/blog-posts/meeting-scheduler-software3

albato.com/blog/publications/best-appointment-scheduling-software-sales-pipeline2

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools2

blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Setmore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Setmore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at setmore.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.