Two of fourteen models named RevenueHero first on the direct prompt; zero named Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules. RevenueHero was named by eight of the fourteen models and Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules by ten and RevenueHero carries 15 labels and Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
By Salesforce, San Francisco, United States, founded 1999. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lead routing and management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, RevenueHero and Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules were named in the same answer ten times, of the 68 answers naming RevenueHero and the 62 naming Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules. In those answers Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules took the first choice zero times and RevenueHero two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, RevenueHero offers the best balance of features, speed, and affordability.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“RevenueHero for a HubSpot-led team mainly trying to improve inbound routing and booking” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Your CRM’s native routing (like Salesforce Assignment Rules or HubSpot Workflows) distributes leads sequentially but lacks the intelligence required for a scale-up.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Limitation: Limited to simple property-based assignment; no availability checking; no deduplication before assignment” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Powerful but steep learning curve... is overkill/expensive for most mid-market unless you have dedicated admins.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you use Salesforce, test whether its assignment rules and automation cover your actual cases” GPT-6 Luna · scale prompt · first choice
“native workflows inside HubSpot or Salesforce are the right place to start since round robin and field-based logic are already built in” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
“The built-in starting point for assigning leads to users or queues... more intricate routing can require custom workflows or code.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.