Every category where a model named Zoho Billing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	2%	6 of 57	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Billing yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Billing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative12 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zoho Billing is an affordable and feature-rich subscription management platform designed for small to medium-sized businesses.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Billing · budget prompt · first choice

“Zoho Billing if you need more advanced features but have under 20 subscribers” MiniMax M2.5 · Billing · budget prompt · alternative

“The Best for Low, Flat Monthly Rates: Zoho Billing ... is the clear winner.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · alternative

“Budget-friendly option for SMBs already in the Zoho ecosystem.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Billing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Billing, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Billing was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Billing31 of 3315Not in the top three

Chargebee30 of 338Not in the top three

Paddle17 of 330Not in the top three

Recurly17 of 330Not in the top three

Maxio16 of 330Not in the top three

Zuora11 of 330Not in the top three

Billsby8 of 332Not in the top three

Whop6 of 331Not in the top three

FastSpring5 of 330Not in the top three

Lago5 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Billing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 33 answers that named Zoho Billing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solidgate.com4

whop.com4

younium.com4

zoneandco.com3

attrock.com2

g2.com2

learn.g2.com2

sotion.so2

stripe.com2

technologyadvice.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Zoho Billing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solidgate.com/blog/best-subscription-billing-software4

whop.com/blog/subscription-billing-software4

younium.com/blog/subscription-billing-platforms4

zoneandco.com/articles/20-best-subscription-billing-platforms-for-different-use-cases3

g2.com/discussions/best-billing-platforms-for-subscription-based-companies2

learn.g2.com/best-subscription-management-software2

sotion.so/blog/best-subscription-billing-software2

technologyadvice.com/blog/sales/best-recurring-billing-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Zoho Billing

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zoho Billing; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zoho Subscriptions / Zoho Billing 1

The company

Zoho Office Suite is the company behind Zoho Billing.

Website: zoho.com
Headquarters: India, India
Founded: 1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Billing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Billing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.