Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 66
1 category · RankedBillsby
27Judge labels
4First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Billing for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 54 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 72
5%19 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market10 of 54
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 59
2%1 label
under the label threshold
In billing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Billsby for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing and subscription management | Revenue operations | 0% | 10 of 54 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 60% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Billsby held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Billing · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 4 → 10 of 51
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 of 58, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 10 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Billsby across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Billsby across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need no-code and predictable low cash outlay: Zoho Billing Standard $25/mo or Billsby for small businesses/startups.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Billing · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want a simple flat monthly fee, Billsby at $45/month is the most affordable dedicated subscription billing platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Billing · budget prompt · alternative
“Billsby is also a strong budget-friendly option because it uses a low, flat monthly fee” Perplexity Sonar · Billing · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want zero upfront cost to test, Billsby is worth exploring.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Billing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Billsby, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Billsby was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Billsby, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Billsby was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Billsby. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Billsby and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
resources.rework.com18
zoneandco.com16
g2.com14
learn.g2.com14
whop.com12
geekflare.com10
albato.com9
maxio.com9
technologyadvice.com8
withorb.com8
118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Billsby came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
billsby.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Billsby takes 0% of first choices and Chargebee takes 60%.ShowHide
Search and answers
billsby.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Billsby takes 0% of first choices and Chargebee takes 60%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “subscription billing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best subscription billing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“billsby”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,447 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 435 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 579
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 10 of 54 in billing
Segment leader
60%
Chargebee
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 27 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Billsby
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Billsby is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Billsby is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Subscription billing software
- For
- Businesses
- Price stated
- Get started - It's free billsby.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial billsby.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Billsby's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: billsby.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Billsby's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Billsby, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Billsby by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Billsby is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Billsby, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.